If people with firearms could end attacks so quickly, why are so many cops shot and killed each year

Oh look... Mr. Slartibartfest manages to triple down on one lie, while making up a new one as he follows me around like a Chihuahua, trying to hump my leg. https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/i-have-good-news-for-you-trump-haters.318558/#post-4611906

Rule of thumb: always assume a leftist is telling the exact opposite of the truth, especially when projecting their faults.

Well done, Mr. Slartibartfest! That's quite an accomplishment for you. :thumbsup:

I was out since around 10am pawn :) Plus I'm a conservative, but a real one.

I saw this, could it be your self-portrait?

upload_2018-2-23_17-23-18.png


Counting my dollar-eye bling bling from a swing.

Pawndexter, nice ring to it..
 
No, I said Trump committed treason, he had to take material support from Russians to win an election and hence he is illegitimate.
Do you have any idea how utterly detached from reality you are?

Even if Trump did "collude with the Russians to win the election" (and he did not), it's not even a crime let alone treason, which is very narrowly defined and not even applicable.

But of course, you know better than a liberal who voted for Hillary and was a professor at Harvard Law School for 50 years.


And you also know better than our founders who defined treason (see Myth #2).

Five myths about treason The Constitution defines it narrowly https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...cee7ce475fc_story.html?utm_term=.0a251281238a

Reality check Mr. exGOPer: You're a total joke, and a pathetic one at that.
 
Do you have any idea how utterly detached from reality you are?

Even if Trump did "collude with the Russians to win the election" (and he did not), it's not even a crime let alone treason, which is very narrowly defined and not even applicable.

But of course, you know better than a liberal who voted for Hillary and was a professor at Harvard Law School for 50 years.


And you also know better than our founders who defined treason (see Myth #2).

Five myths about treason The Constitution defines it narrowly https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...cee7ce475fc_story.html?utm_term=.0a251281238a

Reality check Mr. exGOPer: You're a total joke, and a pathetic one at that.

But Trump broadened to the meaning to not clapping for him Pawndexter.

It could mean anything now. Plus Trump has not said on twitter that as president he can't be charged with treason so... not a good sign. I'm sure he will soon.

I do wonder if interference in the Russian investigation...
 
Do you have any idea how utterly detached from reality you are?

Even if Trump did "collude with the Russians to win the election" (and he did not), it's not even a crime let alone treason, which is very narrowly defined and not even applicable.

But of course, you know better than a liberal who voted for Hillary and was a professor at Harvard Law School for 50 years.


And you also know better than our founders who defined treason (see Myth #2).

Five myths about treason The Constitution defines it narrowly https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...cee7ce475fc_story.html?utm_term=.0a251281238a

Reality check Mr. exGOPer: You're a total joke, and a pathetic one at that.

You may want to do some research scientist.

Dershowitz loves Trump because convicted pedophile Epstein was their common friend, Epstein refused to divulge facts about both Dershowitz and Trump under oath so obviously the bond goes deep. Pedophile Epstein was also Dershowtiz client, he would defend the convicted pedophile as well for the right amount of money and deny there were any victims.

I am well aware that treason is vaguely defined and hard to prove, that doesn't mean I can't call a traitor for what he is.
 
The 1911 will fire a standard .45 round at around 800-900 feet per second? A classic 3000 foot per second AR (rifle) round round carries a lot more energy..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muzzle_energy

Look up the joules of energy in the table.

For a billion bucks I'd take a shot to the vest from a 1911 ten feet away no sweat. I would not take a hit from an AR-15 or similar for any money.


Understand that both are lethal but an AR-15 is a whole other level. Fire through a door, no more armed teacher. A vest wearing security guard? Of the type he could wear all day (plates are heavy)?

It is too much gun for a crazy kid.

Muzzle velocity isn't why the AR-15 round is more deadly.
 
Muzzle velocity isn't why the AR-15 round is more deadly.

Arnie, there are so many ways to argue ballistics... that conversation never ends at gun ranges.

Hydro-static shock is a big part of it, taking a hit in the shoulder and the wave damaging the liver etc.

Big round, fast round, tumbling round, hollow... what distance.. Have you (the guy at the range) seen Dirty Harry...FFS.

In my mind what makes an AR-15 type gun dangerous is it can fire a ~3000 FPS round and the gun and ammo are very light so easy for a weak boy (plus little recoil). Also glorified in marketing and such.
 
Last edited:
You may want to do some research scientist.

Dershowitz loves Trump because convicted pedophile Epstein was their common friend, Epstein refused to divulge facts about both Dershowitz and Trump under oath so obviously the bond goes deep. Pedophile Epstein was also Dershowtiz client, he would defend the convicted pedophile as well for the right amount of money and deny there were any victims.

I am well aware that treason is vaguely defined and hard to prove, that doesn't mean I can't call a traitor for what he is.
Research? Nobody in their right mind would call your absurdities research. You're a pathetic joke, Mr. exGOPer, even for a troll whose life revolves around posting leftist propaganda on the internet.

You seriously claim that Dershowitz -- a liberal Hillary supporter with a distinguished 50 year career as a professor at Harvard Law School -- is diligently alienating his former colleagues and destroying his reputation by lying over and over on national television because he "loves Trump" (but not enough to vote for him) due to a "common friend" who was also a client? Really?

Excellent, Mr. exGOPer! That's even more ridiculous than your claim about treason. Your TDS-ravaged brain has gone full tilt!
 
In my mind what makes an AR-15 type gun dangerous is it can fire a ~3000 FPS round and the gun and ammo are very light so easy for a weak boy (plus little recoil). Also glorified in marketing and such.
Oh look... the useful idiot who claimed AR-15s are military weapons is still peeing himself over them.

What about handguns, Mr. Slartibartfast? The Virginia Tech shooter used a Glock 19 and Walther P22 to kill 32 people. They're lighter and easier to conceal & carry than the evil AR-15. And even you could handle the recoil -- as long as you're wearing your diaper.
 
Back
Top