IB's portfolio margin for collar

Greetings,

I found that IB's portfolio margin requirement is way higher for collar than a risk-equivalent call spread, sometimes 10 times higher for some stocks. The comparison is set up like the following:

K1 is the lower strike, S is the stock price, K2 is the higher strike.
K1 < S < K2

Collar: 100x stock + 1x put @ K1 - 1x call @ K2
Call spread: 1x call @ K1 - 1x call @ K2

Both strategy should have the same risk profile: _/▔. How would they have such different margin requirement? What am I missing? Thanks!
 
Dumb question maybe: what did you mean by "D1"? Also, the reason I'm interested in the margin of collars is they seem to have a smaller slippage than call spreads.
 
IB sucks. Period. A market maker in vol that doesn't understand synthetics.
I am using TD ameritrade with portfolio margin and use their API.
I was thinking of moving to IB as the margins from TDA was higher than IB.
But in IB there is a 30% margin rule for concentrated positions. Do you know what that means?
 
Dumb question maybe: what did you mean by "D1"? Also, the reason I'm interested in the margin of collars is they seem to have a smaller slippage than call spreads.


Delta 1 (100). There should not be an advantage when trading two combos (synthetic and wings).
 
I am using TD ameritrade with portfolio margin and use their API.
I was thinking of moving to IB as the margins from TDA was higher than IB.
But in IB there is a 30% margin rule for concentrated positions. Do you know what that means?


That's on portfolio margin.
 
Back
Top