IMO vaguely is: Core is based on custom pattern recognition algo, about 3k lines of code.Define "vaguely".
IMO vaguely is: Core is based on custom pattern recognition algo, about 3k lines of code.Define "vaguely".
Since you have a profitable algo, I'd obviously define "vaguely" as "upload the full codebase."![]()
Both have advantages but i would not use python in performance hungry core components.wow cpp, thank god for python
Both have advantages but i would not use python in performance hungry core components.
Maybe if wrapper to C like Numpy lib and not too many function calls.
I usually tend to add parameters that can increase test periods exponentially.
Atm its normal for test to take a week
Waiting times with python would be too long (probably like week C++ vs month+ Python)
And idk what to improve next if modifications are not tested.
So in my case development speed and execution speed are both faster with C/C++.
![]()
A good developer is worth 200K annual. Will rather code in python and then buy 96 cores if performance is needed.
IMO its always better to work around a problem vs throw money at it.A good developer is worth 200K annual. Will rather code in python and then buy 96 cores if performance is needed.
In my case it could be parallelized even between server farm and each board could use 1tb+ ram to speed task up.I don't think everything can benefit from parallel processing. Some things have to happen one after the other.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
IMO its always better to work around a problem vs throw money at it.
But yes developer time can cost more than hardware.
In my country avg C++ dev salery was ~2k/month.
At least 3-4 years ago when i checked statistics reported by devs.
With experience and good problem solving skill 3-5k probably negotiable but rare.
16k/month in usa? after taxes?