(I kind of agree with him, but just for the sake of advocatus diaboli, let's play):
Hey emg, you are looking at it all wrong. You pessimist, see it as 72% to 79% of accounts lost money, an optimist may see it as 21% to 28% of the accounts made money.
But alright, you say, get more money to trade with and education. OK, where is the educated people with more money are? Hedge Funds!! OK so let's see how the HFs are doing, shall we?:
"2012:The HFRX, a widely used measure of industry returns, is
up by just 3%, compared with an 18% rise in the S&P 500 share index. Although it might be possible to shrug off one yearâs underperformance, the hedgiesâ problems run much deeper.
The
S&P 500 has now outperformed its hedge-fund rival for ten straight years, with the exception of 2008 when both fell sharply. A simple-minded investment portfolio--60% of it in shares and the rest in sovereign bonds--has delivered returns of more than 90% over the past decade, compared with a meagre 17% after fees for hedge funds."
http://www.businessinsider.com/hedge-fund-performance-2012-12
So there you have it, a 17% per DECADE return on average for HFs. Now that's what I call higher learning, education, more funds and what did you say? Math?
