If you want me to take anything you say seriously, you will need to tell me how you made your millions and how you continue to do so.
Harvesting risk premium. Buying assets with relative value in somewhat illiquid markets. Using leverage. Structuring decisions in a way that increases optionality, especially when it's cheap or free. I don't think I'd consider myself an expert trader or businessman, I run high variance and I have made millions but also lost millions.
I wouldn't say I want you to take me seriously. Although my wife did tell me my reply sounded pretentious lol, so I apologize for giving off that vibe. We'll each trade our beliefs and in the long run capital will tend to concentrate toward those with a more accurate view of the economic world paired with good pathing through the distribution.
Dialogues like these don't tend to be very productive for either party. I started from scratch though, and I had to change some of my beliefs in order to start finding success. People have went out on a small limb for me before and tried to share their perspective even when I was resistant to superior ideas. So that's where I'm coming from I guess.
There are very many smart people whose podcasts I have listened to that understand a debt spiral is literally a ticking time bomb and it can take 10 years or hit next month.
The smartest people were telling everyone to buy bitcoin at $1.
I understand that there are smart people here who trade very well, but they are simply operating in the old world order.
Last thought,
So it's these smart people on podcasts and very early adopters of experimental technology that happened to be the one to take off, versus the aggregate controllers of trillions of dollars of capital, the owners of the largest companies, governments, etc., structured around the current world order. My advice is to try to assign a percentage chance that each party has the right view, and base your decisions off that, instead of getting stuck in binary thinking.
The problem with staking your decisions around a very small sliver of the forward distribution of outcomes is that you are creating a lottery-like effect. Which is your prerogative, but even if there's expected value there, if you over commit, 99/100 times you are just living in a depleted state in the aftermath. There's plenty of opportunity finding/creating value around the mean.
Maybe set a mental stoploss somewhere, like if BTC isn't above $250K on x date, you'll re-evaluate your stance, so you don't spend too much time positioned around a probability estimation and related economic beliefs that turn out to be inaccurate. Best of luck.
