Remember when Zuckerberg tried to create his own Twitter? It even had a great launch for the first few days, but then fell off a cliff. So the adoption is the hardest part.
Look at the hardforks that Bitcoin had in the past. They are all a fraction of the market cap of bitcoin. Some were even great with faster blocktime or more transactions per block, which are all good things if you ask me. But for some reason, they didn't stick.
Look at how much hashpower goes into bitcoin. How are you going to copy that?
There is simply no way to start again. Any project after bitcoin is not as decentralized, or the creators gave themselves free tokens, or its not based on PoW which is the way it has to be if you're going to want your project to be permission-less.
You will always hit a dead-end if you're brainstorming about how to make a new and better bitcoin and arrive at the same conclusion, which is to just adopt bitcoin. Something extremely catastrophic would have to happen in order for the majority to consider switching to something else, so I won't say I'm 100% certain that in 25 years Bitcoin will be on top, but waiting for something better is clearly stupid at this point.
Bitcoin is only worth anything because someone says it is.
At one point 10,000 bitcoin could buy you two pizzas. At another point it took only 5 bitcoin to buy a Lambo. At a later point you couldn't buy a toyota with a bitcoin.
I missed the crypto craze so i'm not the smartest guy in the room. I read about bitcoin in 2010 and thought to myself, why would i let anyone use my electricity and my computer for essentially free. That brilliant lack of vision is why i am a derivatives trader and not a tech billionaire.