I have been censored and kicked out of LinkedIn after decades :-)

Moral damage and pages of shedding tears over a locked up LinkedIn account....i am so glad you were never my professor. What a pity for all those students. I hope you conducted yourself differently in class.

That was already said first thing in the first posts if you were following.

Invasively asking for an ID after 20+ years and only when you do not appreciate some posts, is a deprecable and unacceptable thing in any case, as even the UK government has explained in an official document:

"Anonymity underpins people’s fundamental right to express themselves and access information online in a liberal democracy."

that obviously means that you want the user to be silenced and shut down because obviously, no person in his right mind would ever send a legal ID to these kinds of entities.

Agitated? I suddenly became agitated after 20 years of doing the same things. Right, that is believable. Well yes, I am agitated, and I am also suffering severe (and costly) moral damage. LOL!

They obviously (to me) just like to censor opinions while spreading propaganda. I have seen so many posts affirming that Nadella is a genius. Hammering posts daring to compare Simons with Buffett. Occult propaganda and advertising are mixed/masked as genuine posts. Hammering propaganda about the Ukraine war and against Putin. Idiotic propaganda about "AI", gives a false representation of the real scope and limits of these statistical models.

And, at the first word they do not like, they ask you to send a legal ID.
I have just proved it by creating an obvious straw user, as thousands already there, and showing that the comments addressed to Nadella about AI were immediately targeted.

I did not write any insults in those comments, as can be seen as they were published here in real-time too. Just my professional opinion. This is also probably the opinion of any scientist working on these topics. Still, they did not want them to be shown to the public.

So, instead of replying and arguing, they just shut you down. They want to be right at all costs. This means creating a specific representation that does not necessarily correspond to any truth.

It's like me and you are talking, and to continue the argument, you need to send me your ID or I will just shut you down. How ridiculous is that? Your being right or wrong depends on who you are, not on your argument.

It does not matter who I am. If I am a famous scientist, or professor, or whatever. Just reply to the point if you can. Do not mute or suppress your opponent, taking advantage of your position and making an absurd request.

Arguments from authority
are just for fools. Arguments for censorship are for the foolish and unethical autocrats.

I call that censorship and autocracy. You can call it as you like.

Send your own legal ID to them if you wish ... and send it also to me to continue the conversation, LOL :)

I can only send my finger and possibly a lawsuit. Only in that case, can they see my ID. LOL :)
 
Moral damage and pages of shedding tears over a locked up LinkedIn account....i am so glad you were never my professor. What a pity for all those students. I hope you conducted yourself differently in class.

Yes, you understood that right; congratulations on your brightness!

I am going to sue big time for moral damages, LOL!

After this huge trauma to my frail narcissistic ego, my life will not be the same anymore. I will spend sleepless nights for the rest of my few remaining years, thinking I cannot converse anymore with the Wolf of Wall Street :)


(btw, make sure to turn off your camera, I can still see you :) )
 
Last edited:
You do that. Hope you find a way to cope.

Yes, you understood that right; congratulations on your brightness!

I am going to sue big time for moral damages, LOL!

After this huge trauma to my frail narcissistic ego, my life will not be the same anymore. I will spend sleepless nights for the rest of my few remaining years, thinking I cannot converse anymore with the Wolf of Wall Street :)


(btw, make sure to turn off your camera, I can still see you :) )
 
Facebook fact checked this guy during the pandemic. He appeared many times on DW which is on PBS!!! He purposed a solution to a major problem...Most countries started to come along to his thinking...


I also would post about growing up in my small town...The things we would do in school (California). The below got censored...For the life of me I can not figure out why!!???

I didn't know the Virginia Reel was racist or homophobic...

 
Facebook fact checked this guy during the pandemic. He appeared many times on DW which is on PBS!!! He purposed a solution to a major problem...Most countries started to come along to his thinking...


I also would post about growing up in my small town...The things we would do in school (California). The below got censored...For the life of me I can not figure out why!!???

I didn't know the Virginia Reel was racist or homophobic...




Interesting. You just gave me an idea.

In the new social media, we could add a specific category for stuff "Censored on other social media" (I mean, obviously, not censored because blatantly against the law or because of obscenity, pornography, hate speech, or similar).
 
Interesting. You just gave me an idea.

In the new social media, we could add a specific category for stuff "Censored on other social media" (I mean, obviously, not censored because blatantly against the law or because of obscenity, pornography, hate speech, or similar).

Yes...People will flock to it. The problems is you would get many wackos (Big Foot/no Holocaust) types waiting to post.

Thinking "The National Enquirer"...Which people will laugh at.

But, didn't The National break the Monica Lewinsky story back when...Or was that Drudge??

Is Elvis alive and living in a rest home in Cancun??
 
Yes...People will flock to it. The problems is you would get many wackos (Big Foot/no Holocaust) types waiting to post.

Thinking "The National Enquirer"...Which people will laugh at.

But, didn't The National break the Monica Lewinsky story back when...Or was that Drudge??

Is Elvis alive and living in a rest home in Cancun??


Yeah, I know. You are right.

However, the idiots and the retards too have the right to express their minds and their vision of the world.

One cannot discriminate based on the level of retardation, or else you would need to cut out a big chunk of humanity (also depending on the different topics, as no matter what kind of genius you are, it is always possible to find a field, topic or skill where you just look like a total retard) :)

One would say the earth is flat, and possibly some others would bring proof of the opposite. Someone would say that 9/11 was not planned: others would bring evidence of the opposite.

I am a believer in the capacity of the system to eventually self-regulate, without the intervention of an external "manipulator". The danger of the latter is that if the censorship machine is guided by a retard or a sociopath (which is sometimes the case, or moved by dishonest goals, the social medium could become a propaganda machine, just similar to those we are criticizing.)

I want to believe that if you let it go, given enough time (which can be a very long time), and given enough collective intelligence, most of the "truths" naturally find their way into this reality.

Anyway, at least we can give it a try ... :)
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I know. You are right.

However, the idiots and the retards too have the right to express their minds and their vision of the world.

One cannot discriminate based on the level of retardation, or else you would need to cut out a big chunk of humanity (also depending on the different topics, as no matter what kind of genius you are, it is always possible to find a field, topic or skill where you just look like a total retard) :)

One would say the earth is flat, and possibly some others would bring proof of the opposite. Someone would say that 9/11 was not planned: others would bring evidence of the opposite.

I am a believer in the capacity of the system to eventually self-regulate, without the intervention of an external "manipulator". The danger of the latter is that if the censorship machine is guided by a retard or a sociopath (which is sometimes the case, or moved by dishonest goals, the social medium could become a propaganda machine, just similar to those we are criticizing.)

I want to believe that if you let it go, given enough time (which can be a very long time), and given enough collective intelligence, most of the "truths" naturally find their way into this reality.

Anyway, at least we can give it a try ... :)

People at MySpace were given more latitude and see where it landed.

Jerry Springer...Just saying without "some" monitoring you get real crazy real fast!!
 
People at MySpace were given more latitude and see where it landed.

Jerry Springer...Just saying without "some" monitoring you get real crazy real fast!!


Yep. Well, as Clint Eastwood (reportedly) said to Jim Carrey: we could just "let it go".


It either reaches a point of balance or it would self destroy! :)


PS
Perhaps the "more" latitude is the problem. Just set no boundaries (apart from the law and a general principle of respect for others, obviously).
 
Last edited:
Back
Top