https://abcnews.go.com/US/special-c...obstruction-justice-sources/story?id=56973384
Was thinking the news that drove him crazy today were about indictments.
Was thinking the news that drove him crazy today were about indictments.
I don’t see Trump as having any other option though and I don’t know why Mueller is playing ball with him on the line of questions. If they don’t like the questions, fine, sit him in front of the grand jury.
Talk to him about what?https://abcnews.go.com/US/special-c...obstruction-justice-sources/story?id=56973384
Was thinking the news that drove him crazy today were about indictments.
Heh. As usual, you have it bass ackwards.
Mueller is finding out that he is the one without options. He either has to go with the limited scope that Trump will agree to or else Trump/Guliani will just do nothing.
Oh, and please, we do not have to have that "sit him in front of the grand jury" discussion ad nasuem do we? By all means, just go for it. There is a reason he has not done that so far, eh?
Go for it.
I see you’re back to your old ways. Mueller can subpoena Trump and that is resolved in US v Nixon. Stop getting your legal analysis from judge Judy.
You know by the time they get around to questioning people in investigations like this they already know what they have on them and it is more of a chance to get more info, catch them in perjury or leverage the subject to give up someone else.
I don’t see Trump as having any other option though and I don’t know why Mueller is playing ball with him on the line of questions. If they don’t like the questions, fine, sit him in front of the grand jury.
Excuse me, that last reply should read Judge Jeanine, not Judge Judy. Judge Judy is actually kind of thoughtful.