I am officially running for POTUS as a Democrat in 2024

Alan really puts this entire speech together brilliantly but he hits on the exact point at about the 2 minute mark, although you really should watch the whole thing.

The main thing I worry about is there won't be people willing to work crappy jobs. However, I think it could be used to end some of the worst health issues even if we require some of it to random to prevent a lack of diversity in skills.
 
What if you live in Sweden? Or are we throwing the science out?
But does being black hurt those people in Sweden? Only when they travel to high UV areas are white people hurt. Seems like being white is a negative in some parts of the world while having black skin is either neutral or helpful. Hence you could argue that having black skin is superior.
 
Yeah, but you're a white supremacist. So it's easy to determine to what you would attribute any differences. If for no reason other than because you brought the point up in a discussion about eugenics.

However, from the same link:

Today, the scientific consensus is that genetics does not explain differences in IQ test performance between groups, and that observed differences are environmental in origin.

Since you didn't point out any IQ differences to environmental factors, I can only assume that you were implying genetics...given that you raised the point to begin with in an exchange about eugenics. Which puts you squarely in the camp of those circa 1920s eugenics lobbyists. See how that works?

Whats all this white supremacist nonsense? Just throwing out any old shit to see what sticks. Unenlightened, poor argumentation style. I am not impressed.

I simply make a true statement that is 100% verified in the wiki page you posted. Now that you been exposed,you are trying to move the goalpost.

It is quite telling that I am doing this with the general knowledge that I have, you need to Google to help you, and you are still losing.
 
Whats all this white supremacist nonsense? Just throwing out any old shit to see what sticks. Unenlightened, poor argumentation style. I am not impressed.

I simply make a true statement that is 100% verified in the wiki page you posted. Now that you been exposed,you are trying to move the goalpost.

It is quite telling that I am doing this with the general knowledge that I have, you need to Google to help you, and you are still losing.
The problem with you MAGAs is that you don't even know when you lost.
 
The problem with you MAGAs is that you don't even know when you lost.

You lost pal. You posted a link that was supposed to refute me and it proved my exact point.

Now get out of here.

0E75C.gif
 
You lost pal. You posted a link that was supposed to refute me and it proved my exact point.
Retarded much? Per the link, according to experts in the field, any differences in IQ are attributed in the aggregate to environmental factors rather than genetics. Meanwhile, YOU brought up differences in IQ in a discussion about eugenics?

Are you just too stupid to understand that you stepped in it and are still standing in it neck deep?
 
Yes. Come on man, follow Foreskin's lead and Google vitamin D and skin pigmentation. You claim to be scientific but it sounds like you dont ask too many questions.
Honestly, I admit I was just going along with the picking which skin color is superior out of my asshole. I haven't analyzed all the pros and cons of each. If they can't receive as much Vitamin D, that could potentially be a drawback.
 
Honestly, I admit I was just going along with the picking which skin color is superior out of my asshole. I haven't analyzed all the pros and cons of each. If they can't receive as much Vitamin D, that could potentially be a drawback.
You shouldn't engage in a discussion about skin color with a white supremacist.
 
Yeah, but you're a white supremacist. So it's easy to determine to what you would attribute any differences. If for no reason other than because you brought the point up in a discussion about eugenics.

However, from the same link:

Today, the scientific consensus is that genetics does not explain differences in IQ test performance between groups, and that observed differences are environmental in origin.

Since you didn't point out any IQ differences to environmental factors, I can only assume that you were implying genetics...given that you raised the point to begin with in an exchange about eugenics. Which puts you squarely in the camp of those circa 1920s eugenics lobbyists. See how that works?

It's a touchy subject and no scientist want to touch it. I'm not on the "black people are stupid" camp but the brain is tied to your genes just like your muscles, the color of your skin, the size of your junk, etc... Brain size, neuron count, gray matter/white matter, brain partitioning, all these are dictated to a major degree by genetics. You mate two physics phd's, the likelihood of that kid being smarter than the offspring of two ditchdiggers is fairly slanted.

I have a feeling that just like all evolution, environmental factors drive natural selection and people in cities competing against other animals of intellect (through warfare, trade, etc...) will naturally develop mechanisms for survival different than those nomadic people competing against the elements, predators, famine, etc...
 
Back
Top