Hunter Biden Goes Down Big Time

[TreeFrogTrader]

No felonies.

Still eligible to purchase a firearm.

 

[exGOPer]

Maybe people need to re-read this

112,000 people tried to lie on the form in 2018. 12 were prosecuted. does not indicate what sentences they received, but mentions they weren't likely severe.

https://www.chicagotribune.com/opin...ground-check-prosecutions-20180914-story.html

 

[Tsing Tao]

https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-supreme-courts-alito-defends-against-ethics-questions-2023-06-21/
US Supreme Court's Alito defends private jet trip to Alaska


Regarding the flight, Alito wrote that Singer had "allowed me to occupy what would have otherwise been an unoccupied seat."

Alito stayed at the King Salmon Lodge, which ProPublica said charged more than $1,000 a day. Alito called the portrayal "misleading" and said he stayed in a "modest one-room unit."

Alito said the justices commonly interpreted financial disclosure requirements to mean that "accommodations and transportation for social events were not reportable gifts."

Sooo...its not against the law?

 

[mervyn]

Sooo...its not against the law?

Only if IRS is going to his tax return, like hunter's. No one is opening Alito's tax return, not yet.

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

 

[UsualName]

I'm curious how you say it is mythology when there are photos, videos, admission and hard evidence of crimes being committed? To be clear, I'm talking about Hunter Biden. In regards to Joe, there are definitely trails leading to him but without sufficient resources (resources that were freely and willingly applied to Trump) to pursue to clear the name of Joe Biden, you'll always have this doubt.

What hard evidence is there of crimes being committed that you can point to that goes beyond the tax stuff and the drug stuff already in the plea?

 

[UsualName]

At the risk of being taken out of context, please allow me to clarify. Of course it matters if there is actual fraud. All I was saying is that if enough people believe that there was actual fraud, then a considerable effort needs to be made to show unequivocally that there was no fraud otherwise you're left with a large portion of the populace that distrusts, or even undermines the confidence in the system. And that can be just as damaging as actual fraud would have been.

You still don’t get it. Just because people “believe” something is not a basis to investigate something. You need facts and evidence.

 

[UsualName]

Comer has reported on the countries and the recipients based on bank transaction records that he has and that are still coming in. If he does not have those records, then he will need to explain that. If he does, your Crime Family needs to explain it. You are hoping that it will all go away. I am thinking it will not. A witness of two may not be located but that is independent of the standalone information in the transaction reports.

It’s not going to go away. When comer runs his course and falls flat on his face you’re just going spin the next big lie. This is how it works. Losers.

 

[Tsing Tao]

You still don’t get it. Just because people “believe” something is not a basis to investigate something. You need facts and evidence.

Right, right. Its me that doesn't get it.

I'm not saying anything has to be investigated at all, you clearly want to read past what I said - as usual. All I'm saying is that if you ignore and belittle it, and a vast portion of the population believes in it, you'd best be prepared for the fruits of your labor (or lack of).

 

[Tsing Tao]

What hard evidence is there of crimes being committed that you can point to that goes beyond the tax stuff and the drug stuff already in the plea?

The ownership of an illegally obtained firearm? And then there is all the evidence that can't/won't be explained about payments. But I'd agree that's not "hard" evidence, and likely won't be because the assets being deployed to investigate it aren't on par with the ferocity applied to Trump.