Human climate change big factor in Somali famine

Somalia: the Real Causes of Famine
http://www.globalresearch.ca/somalia-the-real-causes-of-famine/25725

The mainstream media casually attributes the famine to a severe drought without examining the broader causes.
...
Somalia remained self-sufficient in food until the late 1970s despite recurrent droughts. As of the early 1980s, its national economy was destabilized and food agriculture was destroyed.



Somali drought - this is a repeat from the 1960s, 1930s, 1890s, 1850s, 1810s, 1740s, 1600s, and just about the entire Somali history for the last few thousands of years.

But wait... the latest drought and famine is due to "man-made climate change" according to the press.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

The science is settled.

Yeah... I was told the science was settled in my 1970's earth science class when I was informed that global cooling was an 'established fact'.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

The science is settled.

Silly boy, science is never "settled". If science was settled, there would only be newtonian mechanics and no quantum mechanics.
 
Quote from pspr:

LOL More foolishness from the Alarmists.

Study of the orbital mechanics of the solar system in the 1970s led Russians to believe the Earth was about to cool and we should prepare quickly because it will be catastrophic. Their arguments were lost in the rush to warming group-think in the 1990s, but the arguments for impending cold are well founded and still believed by many good scientists. As the sun goes even quieter and January, 2008 saw the greatest year to year temperature drop ever (128 years of NASA GISS data) and thru the end of 2008 remains relatively cool, it is clear cooling needs to be considered as a very plausible future. This is highlighted by 2 papers published in March 2008. Scafetta and West showed that up to 69% of observed warming is from the sun and remind us that the sun is projected to cool and Ramanathan and Carmichael show that soot has 60% of the warming power of CO2. Both papers state that these factors are underappreciated by IPCC. The soot may well explain the Arctic melting, as it has recently for Asian glaciers. Many scientists believe the temperature changes are more dependent on the sun than CO2, similar to the relationship in your home with your furnace. With the Sun's face nearly quiet, the monthly patterns over the last 12 months are most similar to those of 1797 preceding the Dalton Minimum of 1798-1823 during the little ice age (Timo Niroma).

The southern hemisphere has been cooling over the last 10 years, just about as much as the north has been warming. There is no proof within observational data of warming outside of natural variation. Northern Hemisphere Ice Cover- click for latest When 3 of the highest 5 or 6 years in the temperature record (since 1890) occurred over 70 years ago and 1900 was warmer than recent years in the USA (where the best data are), we are nowhere near statistical proof, nor even evidence of warming. Modelers are still unable to include important variables and no one is able to predict the future. At least Hadley Centre have tried (below). While CO2 continues to rise, the temperature has stabilized at a warm level, but not unusually so. Which way will it go? The world seems to be betting on warming. However, the probability of cooling may be equally valid and we must be prepared for both. Cooling presents the real danger. Things that go up and down only go so high. It has always been this way. Image of current northern sea ice (latest). Check the S. hemisphere sea ice (latest).

Virtually all scientists agree that the Earth has warmed a small amount since the year 1000 or, if you choose, since 1850, when instrumented temperature records became reasonably accurate and distributed in key areas of the world. An alternative view, is that the Earth has been cooling since the 1930s when we had 3 of the 5 warmest years since 1860 in the US, and probably globally if the world environmental data base were cleaned up as is happening in the US. This site will be developed to show the science and the impacts related to global cooling, a very scary event compared to warming. It corresponds in the opposite way to the thousands of global warming sites. An unbiased view is at our sister-site: Climate Change Facts. The Editor started his interest in climate change in the 1970s, charged with helping industry adapt to the certainty of global cooling. Tim Ball has documented the cooling trend and its implications.


http://www.climatecooling.org/

And STILL, nothing from a reliable authoritative source. Why can't you denier morons EVER use reliable authoritative sources? Don't you wonder why NOAA and virtually every climate scientist in the world - 97%- and all the world's science organizations are in agreement but you denier morons still deny it? Don't you wonder about that?

Global cooling LOL. pisspoor, do enjoy making yourself look like an ass? After exposing your stupidity with that two year ice chart I would have thought you would crawl away with your tail between your legs and finally shut up. Have you no shame?

PlanetaryClimateGraphsNOAA.jpg
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

And STILL, nothing from a reliable authoritative source. Why can't you denier morons EVER use reliable authoritative sources? Don't you wonder why NOAA and virtually every climate scientist in the world - 97%- and all the world's science organizations are in agreement but you denier morons still deny it? Don't you wonder about that?

Global cooling LOL. pisspoor, do enjoy making yourself look like an ass? After exposing your stupidity with that two year ice chart I would have thought you would crawl away with your tail between your legs and finally shut up. Have you no shame?

PlanetaryClimateGraphsNOAA.jpg
You're still acting the fool, FC. I see you are still using that 97% consensus lie, too. You are like a little minion just repeating the conclusions reached with falsified data and cherry picked time frames. I'm surprised you aren't still posting your 'hockey stick' chart. LOL

FutureCunt, you really need to open your eyes. You have been fed lies and you are swallowing it hook line and sinker. The data sources I've presented to you are beyond reproach. Unlike your falsified data scientists.

I know you are having a problem with the truth but the rest of the readers in P&R realize how wrong you have been and the facts show you are just an alarmist with presenting an old and tired view of the world climate.

It's too bad you are so stupid and stubborn but most of us don't care because we've tried to explain the truth to you but you prefer to remain ignorant, moronic and left behind in the scientific fact department.
 
The world produces enough grain to feed the world and some.
Problems are political , war and infrastructure that reduce the opportunity to get foodstuffs to these people.

Drought is not the problem.

In fact more warming will help produce larger food production.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

Give it up knucklehead, the science is settled.

Saying ... "better safe than sorry..." it's becoming so common it should be the catchphrase of the 21st century. Television anchors stretched, desperately looking to fill airtime, politicians infatuated with the media hype submit new, mostly bad Bills, to fix non-existent or perceived problems, academics anxious about the possibility of having to make it in the real world make proposals for the funding of studies on the hot topics of the day. I call it the “Chicken Little Syndrome”. We live in an era when the media and political leaders are consistently trying to scare the shit out of us. We can’t board airplanes without being frisked because of the risk from terrorists. Every piece of luggage left behind in the subway causes widespread panic. The food we eat causes cancer or worse causes us to be obese. That unusually cold winter is just a fore bearer of a new Ice Age, the drought in the mid-West is a distinct sign of catastrophic global warming......uh.... O' hell just call it Climate Change.

Yes, it is better to be safe than sorry. But it is also better to be smart than stupid. And it is better to be calm than to panic.

Futurecurrents definitely has a bad case of “Chicken Little Syndrome”. YTD, 28 new threads started by FC and 23 on AGW. He states that he just wants to provide new information to the deniers, yet it appears only to be another excuse to post the same old charts and call anyone who provides opposing views, debates, or disagrees an asshole moron. He seems to have the same affliction as Freethinker, surf the web, but not for knowledge, surf only for articles that totally agree with his beliefs, cut, paste, and plagiarize until he gets a false idea intellectualism and then add-in his suffering OCD. I for one pity anyone with such a narrow view of the world. It's been said " ....a mind is a terrible thing to waste......." I would have to agree, a mind is a terrible thing to waste..... I would have to add, and the only one who can waste it is the owner.
 
Back
Top