Human climate change big factor in Somali famine

[Lucrum]

Quote from stoic:


Yes, it is better to be safe than sorry. But it is also better to be smart than stupid. And it is better to be calm than to panic.

Sound wisdom.

 

[nutmeg]

Quote from stoic:



Yes, it is better to be safe than sorry. But it is also better to be smart than stupid. And it is better to be calm than to panic.

.

Better safe than sorry but you only live once so never contradict yourself.

 

[futurecurrents]

Quote from pspr:

You're still acting the fool, FC. I see you are still using that 97% consensus lie, too. You are like a little minion just repeating the conclusions reached with falsified data and cherry picked time frames. I'm surprised you aren't still posting your 'hockey stick' chart. LOL

FutureCunt, you really need to open your eyes. You have been fed lies and you are swallowing it hook line and sinker. The data sources I've presented to you are beyond reproach. Unlike your falsified data scientists.

I know you are having a problem with the truth but the rest of the readers in P&R realize how wrong you have been and the facts show you are just an alarmist with presenting an old and tired view of the world climate.

It's too bad you are so stupid and stubborn but most of us don't care because we've tried to explain the truth to you but you prefer to remain ignorant, moronic and left behind in the scientific fact department.

Yes me and virtually all the world's climate scientists - over 96%- and all the world's science organizations and NOAA and the Met Office and NASA and the Max Plank solar institute and too many others to list are all wrong.

 

[pspr]

Quote from futurecurrents:

Yes me and virtually all the world's climate scientists - over 96%- and all the world's science organizations and NOAA and the Met Office and NASA and the Max Plank solar institute and too many others to list are all wrong.

You just don't have a clue and you seem to enjoy lying. The Met Office revised their forecast to no change, NASA says a global cooling is upon us and the Max Planck Institute says it's going to get colder. Climate change tracks solar output. You just ignore the facts. You're not objective at all.

This even published by NASA. It could be catastrophic for mankind if the cooling is even close to as severe as the Maunder Minimum.

Indeed, the sun could be on the threshold of a mini-Maunder event right now. Ongoing Solar Cycle 24 is the weakest in more than 50 years. Moreover, there is (controversial) evidence of a long-term weakening trend in the magnetic field strength of sunspots. Matt Penn and William Livingston of the National Solar Observatory predict that by the time Solar Cycle 25 arrives, magnetic fields on the sun will be so weak that few if any sunspots will be formed. Independent lines of research involving helioseismology and surface polar fields tend to support their conclusion.

http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2013/08jan_sunclimate/

 

[futurecurrents]

Quote from pspr:

You just don't have a clue and you seem to enjoy lying. The Met Office revised their forecast to no change, NASA says a global cooling is upon us and the Max Planck Institute says it's going to get colder. Climate change tracks solar output. You just ignore the facts. You're not objective at all.

This even published by NASA. It could be catastrophic for mankind if the cooling is even close to as severe as the Maunder Minimum.

Indeed, the sun could be on the threshold of a mini-Maunder event right now. Ongoing Solar Cycle 24 is the weakest in more than 50 years. Moreover, there is (controversial) evidence of a long-term weakening trend in the magnetic field strength of sunspots. Matt Penn and William Livingston of the National Solar Observatory predict that by the time Solar Cycle 25 arrives, magnetic fields on the sun will be so weak that few if any sunspots will be formed. Independent lines of research involving helioseismology and surface polar fields tend to support their conclusion.

http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2013/08jan_sunclimate/

What are you arguing? AGW or solar output? Yes solar output MAY go down. It has been going down. That is NOT the same thing as AGW and is a very unsure prediction. Virtually all the world's experts and science orgs say that the world will continue to rapidly warm from the build-up of CO2 from man and that any solar change is a very small influence relative to the forcing of CO2. There has been no change in that prediction or the overwhelming consensus of the reality of AGW. Don't be a douchebag and try to pull a jem and conflate terms of the argument. The solar output has been going down for 40 years while temps continue to shoot up.

Show me a prediction from NOAA, NASA, the MET OFFICE or any other authoritative source where they say temps will NOT continue to rapidly rise or even slow in the rate of rising. You can't because there isn't any.

You are entitled to your own opinions but NOT your own facts.

 

[gwb-trading]

Quote from futurecurrents:


Show me a prediction from NOAA, NASA, the MET OFFICE or any other authoritative source where they say temps will NOT continue to rapidly rise or even slow in the rate of rising. You can't because there isn't any.

You are entitled to your own opinions but NOT your own facts.

Says the guy who keeps posting his 'facts' (which means posting the same sorry chart created by alarmists over & over again) and ignoring all the actual facts from others in the form of raw data and proper summaries. Why don't you dig into the British Met Office report that demonstrates that global temperatures have not been rising for 16 years and are unlikely to continue a rising trend.