Quote from xelite777:
Here is the percentage of winning/losing traders for various well-known Forex brokers, per quarter.
As you can see, each quarter 75% of traders are losers, on average, OANDA being the only exception (50% are losers), for reasons I cannot explain.
![]()

Quote from xelite777:
Here is the percentage of winning/losing traders for various well-known Forex brokers, per quarter.
As you can see, each quarter 75% of traders are losers, on average, OANDA being the only exception (50% are losers), for reasons I cannot explain.
![]()
Quote from xelite777:
Most traders lose in the long run not because "they trade worse than random" like you said, but because trading in itself is a game with a negative mathematical expectancy to begin with.
Quote from xelite777:
Try this: make 1000 random trades in the Forex market, let's say the EUR/USD with a 3 pip spread. To make things easier let's also say that your stop is equal to your target.
After 1000 random trades, you will notice that your average winning rate is 50% and that your total loss is 3000 pips ($30.000). That 30 grand is in the pocket of your Forex broker.
Quote from tangentShot:
So you trade better than random? And you have to look down on people who lose money? Is that how your mother teach you?
Quote from trefoil:
1 - Keep your commish minimal. That means 2 things: not only finding a low cost platform, but also finding a low cost system.
2 - A low cost system will, almost by definition, be one that allows you to relax, because it protects you from overtrading.
3 - A relaxed trader makes money. A nervous trader loses.
Rule 3 is just a variation on Billie Holiday: them that haz, gits. Simple, actually.
2 can be anything: a low frequency system, an automated system that overall (including commish) wins, a manual system cuz you can't be bothered automating it or it can't be anyway, whatevs. The point is to get to 3, by whatever means necessary.
