Huawei Ban

Where is the source? If this is true then it’s about the 5g turf war. In the bigger backdrop of the trade war. For which the real goal is to prevent China getting the IPs to have foot hold in high tech high value industries.

You need to understand that entire industry sectors in China are owned and subsidized by a totalitarian Communist government. There are truly legitimate grounds for national security concerns.

Huawei is notorious for back dooring spyware - most notably anything that can be communicated with.

Read this:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/feat...ny-chip-to-infiltrate-america-s-top-companies
 
U.S. Accuses Huawei Defense Lawyer of Conflict of Interest. The Lawyer, James Coles , was the number 2 official in Department of Justice from 2011-15.

It is an interesting development. What does he know as a former #2 in DOJ? What this news say about the information/evidence that DOJ might have uncovered from the investigation into Huawei?


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...ole-should-be-disqualified-from-case-u-s-says

As deputy attorney general, James Cole personally supervised and participated in aspects of an investigation (presumably into Huawei) related to that caused the conflicts, the prosecutors said in the filing.

https://www.timesheraldnews.com/wor...justice-department-poses-conflicts-oavdwd6zq0
 
Last edited:
You need to understand that entire industry sectors in China are owned and subsidized by a totalitarian Communist government. There are truly legitimate grounds for national security concerns.

Huawei is notorious for back dooring spyware - most notably anything that can be communicated with.

Read this:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/feat...ny-chip-to-infiltrate-america-s-top-companies

the thing is american software and hardware have backdoors
and US agencies spy everybody including US president

now if i'm US company - is it better for me to be spied by US government or China government?
what about ordinary person?
as a person I would say Chinese spying is safer for me
 
the thing is american software and hardware have backdoors
and US agencies spy everybody including US president

now if i'm US company - is it better for me to be spied by US government or China government?

It depends.

what about ordinary person?
as a person I would say Chinese spying is safer for me

It depends.

The answers depend upon, generally:
  • your (and your loved ones) current location (home, abroad)
  • current political relationship between the countries.
  • your resources (currency, contacts, etc.)
  • what you're worth to either country
  • what you're up to, (profitable activities, criminal activities, etc.); and,
  • whether you (and your loved ones) plan on traveling to that foreign country.
 
Google and Huawei

In line with President Trump's executive order blacklisting Huawei, Google has suspended the Chinese company's access to Android updates. This is a disaster for Huawei, whose Android handsets have made it the second-biggest phone manufacturer in the world, and for existing users of those phones, who may find them getting fewer updates in future (though the Play Store and its malware-scanning functions will continue to work). U.S. chipmakers such as Qualcomm and Intel have also cut Huawei off, as has Germany's Infineon—knocking the share prices of various European chipmakers. Guardian
 
the thing is american software and hardware have backdoors
and US agencies spy everybody including US president

now if i'm US company - is it better for me to be spied by US government or China government?
what about ordinary person?
as a person I would say Chinese spying is safer for me
I would think twice if I were you, China executed more people than the rest of the world combined.
 
This just stinks of market manipulation:

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-e...on-chinas-huawei-morning-brief-101208528.html

U.S. eases some restrictions on China's Huawei: Morning Brief

U.S. eases some restrictions on China's Huawei to keep networks operating: The United States has temporarily eased trade restrictions on China's Huawei to minimize disruption for its customers, a move the founder of the world's largest telecoms equipment maker said meant little because it was already prepared for U.S. action. [Reuters]
 
Back
Top