How To Stop The Soros-funded Violence

piezoe said:
Of course he reviews the benefactors of his open society foundation, but he maintains an arms length distance, for the most part, as others are in charge of the day to day operations. Sometimes groups that they sponsor do not pan out as they had hoped; do things that were not anticipated, and they wouldn't have approved of had they known in advance what was going to happen. Surely you realize that Soros is not there writing checks in day to day contact with all of the movements and groups of people the Foundation has attempted to assist. This is one of the things I admire about Soros the most. He is willing to trust others to do the right thing. If they screw up badly, depending on the circumstances, they may get their funding jerked, but the the foundation does not expect perfection, and part of being an open society is not dictating to people how they should manage their lives. When there are hundreds of millions or billions involved, an organization has to have levels of competence, and you can not expect that one person is going to know every detail of every moment. I know you are smart enough to realize that. This is not just some little pet project of Soros; a rinky dink operation where he personally has to approve of everything.

The reason I know so much detail about the Open Society Foundation is that I have read from cover to cover "

The Philanthropy of George Soros: Building Open Societies'" by Sudetic. A very interesting book. Also there is available:
Building Open Societies Soros Foundations Network 1997 Report.

I doubt if you would want to take the time to read this stuff. But let me give you some solid advice. Don't go around bad mouthing something you know little about. If you're only getting your information from these forums or from You Tube, Breitbart and sources like that, then you essentially know nothing about George Soros's philanthropic activities. Once you're informed, then your opinion counts for something.
More...
My opinion counts more than yours does. The next time you exercise your intellectual curiosity objectively when it comes to Soros, will be the first time. Your Mr. Magoo act when it comes to ideologues like Soros that you agree with is fooling no one.
 
Ricter said:
That's what we need in a highly complex world full of big state actors, a teeny tiny government. We'd fly under the radar, no other country would even notice us or want our stuff!
More...
They wouldn't notice our government or want our government stuff.
 
piezoe said:
Yes he has, of course, but you are not likely to read that on Breitbart. If you read the Sudetic book on the Open Society Foundation activities, you will discover a number of instances where the result was not what Soros would have wanted, and said so.
More...


Yet he has never disavowed anarchistic and antidemocratic violence paid for by groups he funds. Speaks volumes. His victims should sue him. Expose him for the evil monster that he is.
 
Ricter said:
That's the lesson of history, friendly countries, everybody getting along?
More...
Yes, the small friendly countries like Switzerland, Israel, the future U.K. and even Canada would all get along with the U.S.A. And many more would choose to be small and get along. Sort of like the United States. We are up to 50 states now and growing (if we could just get the feds off our back.)

Following pot laws is interesting, it is legal in the states but illegal in the United States. Which side will win? The little itty bitty states or the big bad Federal government?

It was also played out or is still playing in the Supreme Court ACA case concerning who has to pay for an exchange or something. In that case it was the meaning of the word states. Some think that states is synonymous with the United States in which case we all get the bill or something like that.
 
Last edited:
AAAintheBeltway said:
Yet he has never disavowed anarchistic and antidemocratic violence paid for by groups he funds. Speaks volumes. His victims should sue him. Expose him for the evil monster that he is.
More...
how do you know that? You don't of course. You made it up. What you meant is "I don't know of any examples were he has disavowed anarchistic and antidemocratic violence paid for by groups he funds." And that's right, you don't.
 
piezoe said:
how do you know that? You don't of course. You made it up. What you meant is "I don't know of any examples were he has disavowed anarchistic and antidemocratic violence paid for by groups he funds." And that's right, you don't.
More...
What is the opposite of condemn? If you don't condemn you must endorse. It's sort of like going to confession publicly and you have to confess and condemn every bad thing in the world (and the list is getting very long) or you by default endorse. It's all in the PC handbook.
 
De Blasio Urges Anti-Trump Factions to Keep Rioting - I Mean Protesting
Says the man who painted a target on the NYPD's back.

As if we needed proof official Democrats support the anti-Trump riots sweeping the nation...

New York Mayor Bill de Blasio urged dissenters to continue their "protests" Monday, thus ensuring that the lives of American citizens' and police officers will continue to be endangered. This does not surprise us, however, from the mayor who has purposely and repeatedly painted a target on NYPD officers' backs.

"We have to recognize that all over this country, the more disruption that’s caused peacefully ... the more it will change the trajectory of things," de Blasio told Hot 97 radio.

Though we know full well that the disruption is far from "peaceful."

De Blasio has vowed to protest federal government plans to deport illegal aliens residing in New York and encouraged protesters to continue their fight. From the Daily News:

Pointing to Donald Trump’s recent comments on abortion and controversial appointment of an extremist right favorite to the White House, Mayor de Blasio on Monday urged all Americans to continue protesting the President-elect.

De Blasio, speaking after days of roiling protests against the country’s yet-to-be-sworn-in 45th president have sprung up in New York and other cities, said resistance is necessary, especially since Trump is likely to lose the popular vote — and therefore doesn’t have a mandate to rule.

Referencing Steve Bannon, Trump's newly-appointed chief strategist, the New York mayor regurgitated unsubstantiated left-wing talking points about how "white supremacists" will now hold sway in the White House.

"We need to hold Trump accountable for anything he does that encourages hate and division," said the hypocritical de Blasio.

"The more extreme he is, the more people fight back, the more it takes away his power." De Blasio also vowed that while mayor he will refuse any attempts to reinitiate his city's highly successful stop and frisk policies.

"That’s not going to happen on my watch,” the mayor said

http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/de-blasio-urges-anti-trump-factions-keep-rioting-i-mean-protesting
 
15085738_1164616873629271_8855706547655895557_n.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top