No, you did. Wrong word choice. One can safely assume he does not personally know Soros, so he cannot be acting in any way towards Soros to gain advantage. Propagandist or apologist would be better choices.
No, you did. Wrong word choice. One can safely assume he does not personally know Soros, so he cannot be acting in any way towards Soros to gain advantage. Propagandist or apologist would be better choices.
Thank you, and I am not telling you anything you don't already know. Logical argument is lost on these folks. I will add, rather uncharitably I'm afraid, that certainty of ones position is a depressingly common trait of the ignorant. And by that I don't mean 'unintelligent'; I mean 'ignorant'.
Thank you, and I am not telling you anything you don't already know. Logical argument is lost on these folks. I will add, rather uncharitably I'm afraid, that certainty of ones position is a depressingly common trait of the ignorant. And by that I don't mean 'unintelligent'; I mean 'ignorant'.
You might be sliding into the abyss (come on down, the water's great!). You had an excellent habit, not entirely gone, of "leading with values" to give the facts a fighting chance. I've burned my bridge on that, hehe.
I assume you mean the true definition of ignorant, not the "don't know, don't care, and proud of it" attitude that has grown so much in America.
