Quote from NihabaAshi:
snip....
With that said, can someone please explain how this resolves the big debate about Jack Hershey or Puretick???
snip....
austin has a view of the PVT and SCT trading and moreso the fact that posting is done in various threads ....
virgin has a view about the efficacy of the performance levels of PVT and SCT.....
Both are more or less focus on things that are really other than the methods.
austin would rather not have answers posted at all and especially where the questions are raised. He is making this point more or less repeatedly wherever he thinks it is wise to make the point.
Virgin has honed his/her message, over time, to just the consideration of a matter of four or five facets. There is a requirement that has not been met, so to speak, that would put to rest her issues. It has been echoed by others ever since a series of proffs were taken care of that dealt with the these facets. Now at this time, the PVT and SCT stuff on the beginner and intermediate level are being done by many people on many exchanges all over thee world. So now many others, as well, are are doing their performances as it relates to these facets. By the end of 2007 the PVT and SCT will be at the expert levels and there may be a single platform for doing the trading.
austin, recently, proposed a killer question. for a while no one, not even the usual suspects have offered the answer. Were I to address it, I'm sure he would respond with the notion that I'm doing what bighog and he surely and carefully comment upon.
So virgin needed to deal with austin for reasons such as the fist fight precipitators. It may just be macho all over again.
Not many people here have gone through the restraint of having their hands classified as lethal weapons; for sure it changes the way you look at things. A lot of people here have not gone through the shopping center/deep pockets game either. Anyone's corporate lawyer makes damn sure these bases are covered in spades. Here in ET, there are many games played. I like very dry humor and it is easy to assure a response will be tumbling out of the hopper from what ever hopper is tapped for the desired response.
For me I know how 2007 ends and how things will be handled as we get there. I've been monitoring a lot of people for a long time and I am catching on to what can be provided as really great support and comfort to get the job done that they are doing. When a tranference system is being built it takes a lot of considerations, especially if their are some additional benefits that can be inclused along the way.
The greatest benefits we are seeing now is that a lot of interaction is going on that clarifies how the learning is taking place.
So austin's Q does get answered by example instead of just pointing out the key aspects and how each these are resolved.
Nothing virgin or austin can do or are capable of solves any of the debating going on here.
The debate is resolved by giving to the demanders what these debators demand as a requirement. They have initial demands that will be followed by the next demand in the series, etc.. The whole series has been repeated several times in various places over the years. It always turns out the same way. Some demanders adjust to the situation once we provided what they requested and became rich; others figure out that they have to suffer the consequences of their past activities and they can't do the trading as we suggest even though their demands were met.
In this playout, it can be seen from the trades of austin and virgin that neither of them will be able to do PVT or SCT. They have made individual spaces to operate in whereby those spaces are mutually exclusive of the PVT/SCT template space. They will figure this out sometime after 2007 ends. They represent, generally, how it turns out for the people who have joined together as group that is proving to itself that PVT/SCT is not for them.
So there is an answer to austin's killer Q that applies to all learning endeavors and one caveat is that people close the opportunities to learn various different approaches by simply creating consequences that close doors forever on those particular approaches.
