Quote from bwolinsky:
I think we're on the same page, then. Automated systems are different, but they're the only ones I've ever trusted. Your thread makes way more sense now, having stated it's from the discretionary point of view, but sometimes it's hard to tell if the person isn't just pretending they have a system when it's discretionary in nature or requires subjective decisions to trade with. I think the guru you despise may not be the systematic ones, but the other seat of pants traders, and I do share the same sentiment with regard to gurudom.
Yes â I also think we are on the same page
All discretionary traders must have defined rules to trade by (enter/ exit) â otherwise they cease to be traders and quickly become donors â capital contributors to my bottom line if you prefer
However by the very act of having/ implementing rules â a discretionary trader possibly ceases to beâ¦. or not⦠sort of ironic no doubt
But as with all things in life â it is up to the individual to make up their own mind on such matters..
I am a discretionary trader â who does not use discretionary tactics to enter / exit a trade â ever
On another note;
The âtotal freedomâ I described in one of my earlier posts (trading it coming/ going / in between)â¦
Could be misconstrued as a monkey sitting behind a keyboard hitting keys under the auspice of tradingâ¦.
Or
It could describe trading completely detached â simply observing â anticipating â reacting â to what is observed â without hesitation, reservation, or regret.
(maybe even described as trading with maximum efficiency and effectiveness â yep just maybe )
But again it is up to each individual to make up their own mind on such matters..
For the record the gurus I despise are;
The ones who continuously promise answers/ solutions are just over the horizon â but never deliver.
The ones who make trading appear harder than it really is. (it ainât â hell even a redneck can do it)
The ones who do not teach self-sufficiency.
The ones who have holier than thou (egotistical) attitudes.
The ones who claim the ability to train everyone/ anyone. (so exactly what power do they possess to know precisely how anyone else learns â I wonder)
The ones who profess to have unlocked the âsecrete(s)â of trading successfully, and/or guarantee profitability. (really)
The ones who teach trading, but canât/ donât trade. (if youâre going to talk the talk â then walk the damn walk â else sit down and shut up)
The ones who flat out lie / obfuscate â to take advantage of/ fleece traders.
All of these are problematic for less experienced traders, which is why threads like this are so beneficial
Now on a completely different noteâ¦.
I propose we scrutinize the most widely â and possibly the most closely held âbeliefâ
âLet winners run, cut losers shortâ¦.â (least I think this is how it goes)
Soâ¦.
Is it an absolute truth (stands on its own merit)?
Is it a guru-ism? (used to make a trader feel inferior when they do not cut a loser short, or take every available tick out of any given move â so a guru can then show them the âlightâ)
Is it something else?
Does it even pass the common sense testâ¦..?
â¦â¦ without "some" modifications?
Iâll forego posting my views for now, and instead ask for some help in classifying this oneâ¦
BTW â This examination of the âlet winners run, cut losers short" was spurred by another who posted a similar thought here â but quickly deleted itâ¦
A shame really for the only dumb question â is the one never broachedâ¦., the most debilitating act â is the one never taken..
However as I never give my ego much regardâ¦.. nor could I give a damn what others think of meâ¦. I say what the heck⦠letâs discussâ¦
I also know it utmost vital to have thought through the things we hold important â and to absolutely understand why we do so.
Because surely a person wouldnât hold a belief just because âmostâ do⦠or be afraid of being labeled a ânon-believerâ/ wrong â if one couldnât completely justify believing in something â¦. Would one???? I just wonder⦠I guarantee I wouldnâtâ¦
But no matter â onward we go
Regards
RN