well..you can find some setups here and there that might give you some statistical 'edge' >50 or even 70%,but not 95%. even with 95% -there is a plenty of room for a things that can go wrong and against any odds. i see it all the time. and when those 'evil forces' on other side of your screen are running out of statistical arguments-they can always cut off your internet or crash your PC on the middle of the trading day. happened to me many timesQuote from xelite777:
There is no such thing as a "high probability" trade.
You trade, you risk, period.

Quote from macintash:
1/1.5
Quote from Bob111:
well..you can find some setups here and there that might give you some statistical 'edge' >50 or even 70%,but not 95%. even with 95% -there is a plenty of room for a things that can go wrong and against any odds. i see it all the time. and when those 'evil forces' on other side of your screen are running out of statistical arguments-they can always cut off your internet or crash your PC on the middle of the trading day. happened to me many times![]()
in fact-i had such moment today on one account
OP-just buy a s** load of OTM options in that direction. rinse and repeat few times and you will own all the money in the world in about 10 -15 shots![]()
Quote from xelite777:
That's still another Wall Street myth.
A trader could lose money in the long run even if his Risk/Reward ratio is 1 to 100 (in other words he is "only" risking 1 unit to make 100 units).
Take the Lottery for instance. You are "only" risking $1 to make millions (superb risk/reward ratio), but in the long run you will lose money (50% of your money to be exact).
What's important is your mathematical edge, assuming your system has one in the first place.
Quote from macintash:
If you find a trade with a high probability (95% confidence rate) of making a nice profit, how much % of account value would you risk? 2%? 5%? 15%? 35%?
Quote from jack hershey:
Certainty is the basis of my approach.
Quote from jack hershey:The policy is to use 94% of capital.