Riiiight...Drawdown I know very well, but mark-to-mkt I would need to lookup first...
So, what is your point?
Mark-to-market accounting
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark-to-market_accounting
"
Mark-to-market or fair value accounting refers to accounting for the "fair value" of an asset or liability based on the current market price, or for similar assets and liabilities, or based on another objectively assessed "fair" value.[1] Fair value accounting has been a part of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) in the United States since the early 1990s, and is now regarded as the "gold standard" in some circles.[2]
Mark-to-market accounting can change values on the balance sheet as market conditions change. In contrast, historical cost accounting, based on the past transactions, is simpler, more stable, and easier to perform, but does not represent current market value. It summarizes past transactions instead. Mark-to-market accounting can become volatile if market prices fluctuate greatly or change unpredictably. Buyers and sellers may claim a number of specific instances when this is the case, including inability to value the future income and expenses both accurately and collectively, often due to unreliable information, or over-optimistic or over-pessimistic expectations of cash flow and earnings.
"
So, then allow me this basic question: how does this relate to my posting?
Your PNL is based on the mark-to-mkt valuations of your options positions. These valuations are sensitive to levels of implied vol, to a lesser or greater degree. Again, think about the logic you have applied to determine that "development of volatility plays a role for the option buyer". Things cannot possibly be any different for the opposite position.
)