Quote from Free Thinker:
its kind of funny watching the righties here and in the media making all kinds of excuses why no more information need be released after four years of rightwing mouthpieces scouring every possible avenue looking for something that would make obamas birth certificate false even after every expert has testified that it is real.
i guess the right wing mind is just different.
We're not hitting him merely because he's rich, all of our presidents are comparatively rich. We're hitting him because he's unethically rich (legality does not change that), and because he does not represent the common man, and his policies appear intentionally designed to hurt the common man.Quote from CaptainObvious:
There is no excuse making. He simply doesn't have to show anymore than he has.
What the radical left is trying to do is say a guy is guilty of distributing child porn just because a guy has a computer. Someone is guilty of hit and run because they drive a car. Guilty of muder just cause you own a weapon. It's absurd!
The reality is you people just want to hit the rich guy for being rich. That's weak as hell, especially considering there are so many other relevant issues to hit him with.
Quote from CaptainObvious:
There is no excuse making. He simply doesn't have to show anymore than he has.
Quote from Ricter:
We're not hitting him merely because he's rich, all of our presidents are comparatively rich. We're hitting him because he's unethically rich (legality does not change that), and because he does not represent the common man, and his policies appear intentionally designed to hurt the common man.
(Clearly you don't understand international trade), but the main thing is that you acknowledge that that which is legal may nevertheless be unethical--in your example, taxation.Quote from jem:
...its why I argue we should drop personal income tax and go to some other method to raise revenues such as tarrifs.
Quote from Ricter:
(Clearly you don't understand international trade), but the main thing is that you acknowledge that that which is legal may nevertheless be unethical, in your example, taxation.
Quote from Ricter:
We're not hitting him merely because he's rich, all of our presidents are comparatively rich. We're hitting him because he's unethically rich (legality does not change that), and because he does not represent the common man, and his policies appear intentionally designed to hurt the common man.