How can you even claim that technicals matter?

Here's TSLA after it recently went way up on earnings. Are you saying there's something after the jump that is explained by technicals?
You are looking for a "one size fits all" answer, and no such thing exists. Its an art dude, there are dozens of different scenario's.

In TSLA's case, it has (or had as of last week) the highest short interest of any stock in the U.S. So in cases like that, you have to take that into consideration. Then they blow out the expectations, on paper at least, and up it goes. So no... in this case I would say no T/A applies. Amazon is the same thing really. They can adjust their numbers and margins any which way they want for earnings, Bezos could care less about Wall Street's game. AMZN has always been like that. They will beat or miss whenever they so chose. Now... let the dust settle some on both TSLA and AMZN, let us enter a slow period when no other macro events are going on... and slowly but surely T/A will in fact work on them to an extent for both intra-day and as swing trades.
 
... or just some "mystery of the universe" like using Fibonacci sequence..
So either it doesn't work (you say) or it does work but only because it is self fulfilling (others say) is music to my ears in believing in and understanding and using FIBS since the late 90's.

Difference in opinions make a market.
 
Very good possibility of a bounce off of short term support. Very likely it won't be a swing low that lasts:
SPX bounce.png
 
Back
Top