You could be right. I was thinking that NineEnder might be more like a Puerto Rican bond. And that would be multi-cultural so he might like that. That type of bond is practically worthless too but lets not take the analogy too far. We don't want NineEnder to have to go to his safe space.
House Panel Approves $10B for the Wall.
- Thread starter peilthetraveler
- Start date
You could be right. I was thinking that NineEnder might be more like a Puerto Rican bond. And that would be multi-cultural so he might like that. That type of bond is practically worthless too but lets not take the analogy too far. We don't want NineEnder to have to go to his safe space.
Hillary won the popular vote twice and still lost because she has bad strategy. How shitty of a leader would she be when she can't even win the presidency with more votes than everyone else? She had more than Obama and lost. She had more than Trump and lost. Imagine her running the military having more firepower than the rest of the world now. What would be the outcome? We'd lose.
Solid points Peil.She wasn't my first choice but I do think she would have been a better President than Trump.
Contrary to the detritus you just wrote piezoe, if you were paying attention and intelligent enough to think for yourself you knew Trump had a very strong chance of winning.
summary for democrats.
first post
1. Nate Silver says if Trump is within 2 points he could win...
second post
2. Jem writes that the algo finally triggers after the hearding and it says Trump is in the margin of error on the national vote so he wins the electoral college.
https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...-without-the-algo.301548/page-76#post-4353456
summary for democrats.
first post
1. Nate Silver says if Trump is within 2 points he could win...
second post
2. Jem writes that the algo finally triggers after the hearding and it says Trump is in the margin of error on the national vote so he wins the electoral college.
https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...-without-the-algo.301548/page-76#post-4353456
- TLDR... Nate Silver says close race clinton lose the electoral college.
Nate Silvers 538 said given stated yesterday... that given a 3 or 4 point lead in the polls it looked like Clinton had a 70 percent chance of winning but.... they then discussed what if the race tighten to less than 2 points.... (which it has if you look at today's polls.)
The question is how robust Clinton’s lead would be to a modest error in the polling, or a further tightening of the race. So here’s a second set of simulations, drawn from cases in which Trump or Clinton win the national popular vote by less than 2 percentage points:
see a chart of simulations here http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/election-update-yes-donald-trump-has-a-path-to-victory/
This isn’t a secure map for Clinton at all. In a race where the popular vote is roughly tied nationally, Colorado and New Hampshire are toss-ups, and Clinton’s chances are only 60 to 65 percent in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. She has quite a gauntlet to run through to hold her firewall, and she doesn’t have a lot of good backup options. While she could still hold on to Nevada, it doesn’t have enough electoral votes to make up for the loss of Michigan or Pennsylvania. And while she could win North Carolina or Florida if polls hold where they are now, they’d verge on being lost causes if the race shifts by another few points toward Trump.
In fact, Clinton would probably lose the Electoral College in the event of a very close national popular vote.
- Note... against all lefty ridcule the algo's prediction of herding has taken place - many of the crooked polls adjusted.
So the algo has been triggered...
It had Hillary in the lead but within the margin... but now its seems to be saying on Nov. 7th it will call it for Trump. That 16 point lead with independents translates to a convincing victory - if it holds.
That "if" is the algos main objection to calling it for Trump today. The odds are the mass media will do something big and anti trump over the weekend.
developing..
So she was your 2nd choice...You really have to wonder though, why nobody besides a 74 year old crazy man would run against her and give the people more of a choice.
Only 9% of America Chose Trump and Clinton as the Nominees
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive...nt-of-america-selected-trump-and-clinton.html
It was an ugly puppy competition like never before and this time the majority did not even choose the least worst, Trump was the screw-em-all choice of moderate whites, not a preferred.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive...nt-of-america-selected-trump-and-clinton.html
It was an ugly puppy competition like never before and this time the majority did not even choose the least worst, Trump was the screw-em-all choice of moderate whites, not a preferred.
don't you fucking read nate silver on this subject when I give you a link.
he explained trump had a good chance to win the electoral college even if hillary won the popular vote.
is that reality just too hard for you to accept... so you pretend its not true...
here is the link... learn something about how closed minded you are...
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/election-update-yes-donald-trump-has-a-path-to-victory/
he explained trump had a good chance to win the electoral college even if hillary won the popular vote.
is that reality just too hard for you to accept... so you pretend its not true...
here is the link... learn something about how closed minded you are...
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/election-update-yes-donald-trump-has-a-path-to-victory/
Actually, Tony was Spot on. (See my response to "little jem".)