Grob-
Thanks for taking the time to form a reply. Although, I didn't
expect you to attempt to provide some sort of documentation
on the subject, certainly not an attempt at proof. It only weakens
your credibility from my perspective, I respect your diligence nonetheless. Whatever the document is claiming, if it is gains for you in realtime then hip..hip to you.
If your bullshit works for you, then who the hell am I to critique.
Wasn't trying to, certainly wasn't trying to disprove a thing you said. Really wanted to know whether you believed what it was that you were saying.
Question answered.
I do however, completely disagree with your belief that the Futures market is as you put it, "Uncomplex" <- -still deciding
on this cute little compound.
you state: "futures indexes have two variables: price and volume. When one person wins the other does not.......""
This is not true. A KISS scenario for you would be a long-term holder of a contract for any given point in the market/time by which the holder turns seller and relieves themself on the contract, to a buyer who intends to hold for a few seconds, at a few seconds later time said buyer realizes an appreciation of value in held contract then sells, to a oh, take a guess....
the cycle continues.
Hummm, I wonder how that looks in the equities market.....
Oh, about the Econ 101 text. If you are still offering up advice for any given reader to go out and get or reread a copy, then you haven't realized what many others have.
The text is useless. ;-)
best-
momo
Thanks for taking the time to form a reply. Although, I didn't
expect you to attempt to provide some sort of documentation
on the subject, certainly not an attempt at proof. It only weakens
your credibility from my perspective, I respect your diligence nonetheless. Whatever the document is claiming, if it is gains for you in realtime then hip..hip to you.
If your bullshit works for you, then who the hell am I to critique.
Wasn't trying to, certainly wasn't trying to disprove a thing you said. Really wanted to know whether you believed what it was that you were saying.
Question answered.
I do however, completely disagree with your belief that the Futures market is as you put it, "Uncomplex" <- -still deciding
on this cute little compound.
you state: "futures indexes have two variables: price and volume. When one person wins the other does not.......""
This is not true. A KISS scenario for you would be a long-term holder of a contract for any given point in the market/time by which the holder turns seller and relieves themself on the contract, to a buyer who intends to hold for a few seconds, at a few seconds later time said buyer realizes an appreciation of value in held contract then sells, to a oh, take a guess....
the cycle continues.
Hummm, I wonder how that looks in the equities market.....
Oh, about the Econ 101 text. If you are still offering up advice for any given reader to go out and get or reread a copy, then you haven't realized what many others have.
The text is useless. ;-)
best-
momo
