hmm.no edges in the markets

[wrbtrader]

Quote from marketsurfer:

...Obviously, if you don't make claims then your post makes sense and I agree with you...

Next time please remember the above whenever you see someone make claims here at ET that TA works all by itself or that they only use TA and nothing else. Simply, aim your "dick measuring" tactics to that person.

Lastly, why you trolling in this thread with the same B.S. ta debates. Please get back on topic and talk about gambling and ignore anyone that talks about how pretty their TA is or whenever someone posts a chart.

Seriously, instead of getting upset, shouldn't you be ENCOURAGING those TA folks to use TA for trade decisions so that they can be on the other side of your trades.

 

[marketsurfer]

Quote from Ned Stark:

Agreed. It just doesn't make any sense whatsoever.

OPM doesn't make sense to you? Even PTJ and Warren Buffett use OPM. DO you understand the concept of zero downside risk? How about risk transfer the great advantageous inherent in this idea?

One would have to be crazy not to give the combine a try--- there is nothing to lose and literally 100's of millions if you can do what you say you can. Perhaps not from the combine, but the exposure and track record could make you very wealthy. If you dont want this, why post here at all?

 

[Ned Stark]

Ok, I take that back. It does make sense for certain people. I'm thinking about my personal situation, for which, this combine does not make any sense. I'm already sufficiently capitalized for how I trade.

Quote from marketsurfer:

OPM doesn't make sense to you? Even PTJ and Warren Buffett use OPM. DO you understand the concept of zero downside risk? How about risk transfer the great advantageous inherent in this idea?

One would have to be crazy not to give the combine a try--- there is nothing to lose and literally 100's of millions if you can do what you say you can. Perhaps not from the combine, but the exposure and track record could make you very wealthy. If you dont want this, why post here at all?

 

[marketsurfer]

Quote from wrbtrader:

Next time please remember the above whenever you see someone make claims here at ET that TA works all by itself or that they only use TA and nothing else. Simply, aim your "dick measuring" tactics to that person.

Cornix and Doji claim to use TA and money management to great success--- All they look at is price, maybe volume to make decisions--- I say it is impossible to consistently profit this way without other inputs---

They have made the claims, they need to prove the claims, not me.

surf

 

[marketsurfer]

Quote from Ned Stark:

Ok, I take that back. It does make sense for certain people. I'm thinking about my personal situation, for which, this combine does not make any sense. I'm already sufficiently capitalized for how I trade.

No question, if you are already wealthy -- then it may not make sense for you. Unless you make claims here, then you will be called out to prove it. the funny thing is, Ned, not one of the TA claim makers, mentor types here have stepped up to the plate. surf

 

[wrbtrader]

Quote from marketsurfer:

Cornix and Doji claim to use TA and money management to great success--- All they look at is price, maybe volume to make decisions--- I say it is impossible to consistently profit this way without other inputs---

They have made the claims, they need to prove the claims, not me.

surf

Dude, my name is NOT cornix nor Doji nor am I having any conversations with them in this thread. Therefore, as I stated before, next time aim your "dick measuring" contests to those you don't like what they're saying about TA as if its the only thing you need and nothing else.

Mark (a.k.a. wrbtrader)

 

[sellindexvol66]

surf..why do they "have to prove their claims"?

they both have on occasion posted blotters which is better than 99% of talkers here.

 

[wrbtrader]

Quote from marketsurfer:

No question, if you are already wealthy -- then it may not make sense for you. Unless you make claims here, then you will be called out to prove it. the funny thing is, Ned, not one of the TA claim makers, mentor types here have stepped up to the plate. surf

Timothy Sykes has and that girl has although I'm don't know the name of the girl. What's her name ?

Note: Timothy Sykes was once a member of ET and you did not attack him about his use of TA when he was here saying how successful of a trader he was and when he was "defending" his trade approach in penny stocks. Therefore, why didn't you call out your good friend Timothy Sykes

Can't you see that you have no integrity here at ET anymore after the price drivers fiasco along with you continuing to talk about how impressive someone is in their trading while minimizing their use of TA as if they are some sort'uv "exception" to our TA debate because you personally know them. You're only left with trolling from thread to thread to start TA arguments. It's getting pathetic don't you think.

 

[cornix]

Quote from marketsurfer:

OPM doesn't make sense to you? Even PTJ and Warren Buffett use OPM. DO you understand the concept of zero downside risk? How about risk transfer the great advantageous inherent in this idea?

One would have to be crazy not to give the combine a try--- there is nothing to lose and literally 100's of millions if you can do what you say you can. Perhaps not from the combine, but the exposure and track record could make you very wealthy. If you dont want this, why post here at all?

That's true, OPM is like free option. That's why I do it in addition to my own trading. But the question is different: is Combine really an optimal way to do OPM? How much they promise to fund successful trader with? Under what conditions?

 

[tobbe]

Quote from wrbtrader:

Timothy Sykes has and that girl has although I'm don't know the name of the girl. What's her name ?

According to the website her name is Alla Peters.

According to the website her affiliates (remember Marketsurfer is one) get a 30% commission on all sales. Education is $3200 or so, mentoring is $6900 or so.

How is this not stealth vendoring...?