Quote from marketsurfer:
I don't know you, but I like you. You are an excellent writer. However, you make assumptions put forth as fact---- she was personally introduced to me by another friend. Yes. What i observed was impressive but I have also been impressed with astrological forecasts that were uncannily accurate. Has nothing to do with the underlying premise being faulty.
WRB. Why don't you step up to the plate and participate in the combine to publicly prove TA.
No need to stop making money, in fact, have much more money with no risk if you pass. Plus you can trade simultaneously. Ask Austin P. he explains the why.
surf
Did you not see my

or ???
Those are not assumptions. I asked questions so that a person (you) can clarify to ensure there are NO assumptions. Simply, you could have only replied with the following statement without the other crap about me making assumptions.
she was personally introduced to me by another friend.
I would have then replied to the above via saying something like...
Thanks for the clarification.
*****
By the way, thanks for confirming to me that you know someone else (besides Timothy Sykes) that impressively trades while using TA regardless how important the TA is to that person.
*****
With that said, I do not know what the hell is a combine but if its with
real money...send me the information via private message. In contrast, if its just another
simulator contest designed by some prop firm...I'm truly not interested because I DON'T DO prop nor do I want any kind'uv firm marketing their business on my back. In addition, you do not know how much money I have. Therefore, its impossible for you to say I will have
much more money.
I work for
myself...not for someone else. I'm well capitalized and if I needed "more money" I would sell one of my properties or sell at auction some of my art works...please don't take my lack of interest in someone's business model as negative for what they do for others.
By the way, you have this "dick measuring mentality" whenever someone catches you saying someone is
impressive in their trading while at the same time minimizing their use of TA. I find that bizarre behavior response by you that you consistently do here at ET.
Your next response should be as you've done in the past about people you've said has
impressive trading...
She uses TA but for illustration purposes only. Thus, her TA use has no impact on her trade decisions and she can not prove that TA works for her.
By the way, I've already proven publicly that TA works with other tools along with showing that TA does
not work alone. You probably missed that memo.