Hillary - Butchered Benghazi
- Thread starter jem
- Start date
Damn! I think you're onto something BIG with that one! If we only had a single day where the msm would stop holding Onazi's tiny little balls, and open their eyes...:eek:
People NEED to be in jail over this travesty, and I believe it starts with Onazi, and works it's way down. Oh yes, crookery...er, Hillary would MOST DEFINITELY be implicit, and jailed!
I believe exgopher is being paid to destroy the value of this board seo wise.
many of our conversations rank on google very quickly.
its why I participate. if goper can post crap and when people come here they see nothing but leftist shit... at the top of the threads... people will stop visiting.
google will see fewer visits and fewer people sticking around... and we will no longer have a good venue for our pro freedom anti tax posts.
many of our conversations rank on google very quickly.
its why I participate. if goper can post crap and when people come here they see nothing but leftist shit... at the top of the threads... people will stop visiting.
google will see fewer visits and fewer people sticking around... and we will no longer have a good venue for our pro freedom anti tax posts.
You know none of that will happen. The MSM is where the parasite sheeple get their news and information... so, Hillary, et al, are going to skate once again.
Worse still Benghazi is going to be overlooked, rather than holding her accountable for the role she played in the death of 4 Americans, as she runs for prez in '16. And unfortunately, I think she'll win... as the parasite class will vote for "more parasitism", regardless. After all, they really don't want a job... if they can get enough money from the government to be comfortable sitting on their collective asses watching Oprah.
glen beck had sources that said this almost from day one.
these terrorists had been armed to take down Ghaddafi by Clinton and Obama and now Stevens was there to try and get the arms back.
that our own weapons were used against us. that once this happened Clinton or Obama did not want Stevens and his team to live to talk about why.
a few months ago it was popping up again from other sources. but then it seems to have died down since this senate report.
I am wondering if Issa and the former prosecuter guy are saving up all there evidence for a big announcement someday... or if the establishment is really just going to sweep this under the table.
You know it was pretty bad when the senate report came out and said yes... there were requests for more security. Imagine what the Rs on the committee had to give up in order for that simple headline to be on top.
these terrorists had been armed to take down Ghaddafi by Clinton and Obama and now Stevens was there to try and get the arms back.
that our own weapons were used against us. that once this happened Clinton or Obama did not want Stevens and his team to live to talk about why.
a few months ago it was popping up again from other sources. but then it seems to have died down since this senate report.
I am wondering if Issa and the former prosecuter guy are saving up all there evidence for a big announcement someday... or if the establishment is really just going to sweep this under the table.
You know it was pretty bad when the senate report came out and said yes... there were requests for more security. Imagine what the Rs on the committee had to give up in order for that simple headline to be on top.
I was explaining the theory.
I am waiting to see if it develops.
it is not very hard to suspect it has some truth because of the way the adminstration lied about this for weeks.
we want answers. let the witnesses testify. why the coverup?
I am waiting to see if it develops.
it is not very hard to suspect it has some truth because of the way the adminstration lied about this for weeks.
we want answers. let the witnesses testify. why the coverup?
Sitting in a coffee shop the other day, I encountered a man and his friend discussing the 2016 election. Curious, I, admittedly, eavesdropped and learned that the man intended to vote for Hillary in 2016.
Why? Because, as he described his ârationaleâ: âShe could be the first woman president and I want to tell me daughter that that ceiling has been broken.â
Apparently, this is not an uncommon sentiment as a recent Gallup Poll indicates that the vast majority of Americans questioned claim that if they were to vote for Hillary, it would be simply because sheâs a woman.
According to Politico:
Asked what the best thing about the former secretary of state being elected president would be, 18 percent of those surveyed in a Gallup poll released Friday said her breaking the gender barrier. That total was double the next answer, which was her experience and foreign policy chops.
In third place, with 8 percent, was that she would be a change from the Obama administration.
Other smaller reasons were that Bill Clinton would be in the White House again and could offer advice (2%) and that she would be âgood for common peopleâ (1%).
Itâs incredible that in this day and age when we are supposed to consider the quality of character and the level of experience one is supposed to bring to a position of power that the vast majority of those polled would so candidly claim that the best thing about Hillary Clinton is her gender.
Perhaps even more disturbing, however, is the 8% that claimed that she would deserve the prestigious position because of her supposed foreign policy experience.
Aside from horrendously mismanaging the State Department and facilitating the murder of four Americans at the hands of Islamic militants, there must remain one central question as we hurl towards 2016: what accomplishments, other than the aforementioned Benghazi debacle, has Hillary achieved?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So many voters fucked up and voted Odumbo simply to put a (half) black guy in the WH. Now those same bozos think it would be a good idea to vote for the Hilldabeast, simply because she has a vagina?
Why? Because, as he described his ârationaleâ: âShe could be the first woman president and I want to tell me daughter that that ceiling has been broken.â
Apparently, this is not an uncommon sentiment as a recent Gallup Poll indicates that the vast majority of Americans questioned claim that if they were to vote for Hillary, it would be simply because sheâs a woman.
According to Politico:
Asked what the best thing about the former secretary of state being elected president would be, 18 percent of those surveyed in a Gallup poll released Friday said her breaking the gender barrier. That total was double the next answer, which was her experience and foreign policy chops.
In third place, with 8 percent, was that she would be a change from the Obama administration.
Other smaller reasons were that Bill Clinton would be in the White House again and could offer advice (2%) and that she would be âgood for common peopleâ (1%).
Itâs incredible that in this day and age when we are supposed to consider the quality of character and the level of experience one is supposed to bring to a position of power that the vast majority of those polled would so candidly claim that the best thing about Hillary Clinton is her gender.
Perhaps even more disturbing, however, is the 8% that claimed that she would deserve the prestigious position because of her supposed foreign policy experience.
Aside from horrendously mismanaging the State Department and facilitating the murder of four Americans at the hands of Islamic militants, there must remain one central question as we hurl towards 2016: what accomplishments, other than the aforementioned Benghazi debacle, has Hillary achieved?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So many voters fucked up and voted Odumbo simply to put a (half) black guy in the WH. Now those same bozos think it would be a good idea to vote for the Hilldabeast, simply because she has a vagina?