Hillary - Butchered Benghazi

[jem]

the facts are Hillary was warned many times and she did nothing.
the facts are the persisted with the video myth for weeks when they knew it was islamists with motars and guns

you can't change those facts with your leftist drone garbage.

And still they prefer to stay deluded when presented with the facts. Pathetic. The problem with America is the douchebag ignorant delusional righties.

 

[jem]

more facts from the report...

The Report is prima facie evidence that Hillary failed to answer the 3:00 PM call she faced on September 11, 2012 once the attack started on the Mission. Finding #1 of

The Report makes clear that Clinton ignored the “ample strategic warning that [the] security situation in eastern Libya was deteriorating and that U.S. facilities and personnel were at risk in Benghazi.” On September 5th, six days before the attack, AFRICOM produced a report stating, on page 11, "disarray in Libya and a likely focus by authorities on pursuit of Qadhafi loyalists is likely allowing jihadists in Libya freedom to recruit, train, and facilitate the movement of fighters and weapons. The threat to Western and U.S. interests and individuals remains high, particularly in northeast-Libya.” Benghazi is the largest city in northeast Libya.

The Report also makes clear that a top Clinton lieutenant denied Amb. Stevens’s requests for greater security at the Benghazi Mission. Finding #2 of The Report states that “(t)he State Department should have increased its security posture more significantly in Benghazi based on the deteriorating security situation... including two incidents at the Temporary Mission Facility on April 6 and June 6, 2012.” [p. 12] Both of these attacks included IEDs being directed by Islamists at the Mission.
The Report explains that Amb. Stevens and other State Department officials outlined “concerns via cables to State Department headquarters about the security of the Mission compound and made several requests for additional resources.” [p. 14] Yet Clinton’s State Department was filled with “confusion over who, ultimately, was responsible and empowered to make decisions on both policy and security concerns.” [p. 16] Simply stated, Clinton was too incompetent to run a proper Department whose bureaucracy could prioritize the safety of her subordinates.


Not only did Hillary’s incompetence bungle the Mission’s security, but direct evidence exists which proves that top State Department officials under Clinton denied the Mission proper safety protocols. Internal State Department memos unearthed by Fox News show that Clinton’s Under Secretary Patrick Kennedy signed off on an action memo “that green-lighted the Benghazi operation” with the caveat that the Mission be “exempted… from mandatory physical security standards” of a Consulate.
It strains credulity to believe that Hillary was not aware of the action memo, especially since Clinton misled the public on a “diplomatic victory” in Libya as early as November 2011 when she “was quick to announce that the U.S. committed $40 million to help Libya secure and recover its weapons stockpiles.” This would be the same month when The Telegraph reported that the Al Qaeda flag was pictured “flying above the Benghazi courthouse building… alongside the Libyan national flag.”

 

[futurecurrents]

Clinton did nothing wrong. Much of the blame lies with Stevens who refused help. He thought the locals were trustworthy.


But of course the right wing propaganda machine is in overdrive trying to discredit their biggest threat.

 

[LEAPup]

Clinton did nothing wrong. Much of the blame lies with Stevens who refused help. He thought the locals were trustworthy.


But of course the right wing propaganda machine is in overdrive trying to discredit their biggest threat.

HOLY FUCK!!!!!!!!!!!! That man asked for additional security!!!!! The two former SEALs BOTH asked for additional security. I absolutely CANNOT believe I just read what I did!!!! You're a no good faggot who DESERVES to install heaters, and live a MISERABLE life!!! The man is dead! He was beaten unmercifully, sodomized, murdered, then dragged through the streets by the VERY SAME muslims Onazi supports, and yet, you support the FUCKING WHORE who did nothing when this now-dead man asked for additional security/help! You're a sick pile of shit! Here! Go and take a look at what happened to the man who asked for help!!!

See how he's still alive (arm moving) and naked from the waist down, and being thrown around by muslims just like your "God" Onazi?? Take a look mother fucker! I WISH I would have had you in Iraq so I could shove your face in the rotting remains of people who were killed by muslim terrorists!!!! And after I had you puking up your shoes, I'd beat you so bad, your brains would run out of your ears, you nazi son of a bitch!

 

[Tecumseh Sherman]

President Obama was reelected after Benghazi. Polls show President Obama's successor Hillary Clinton beating every GOP candidate handily in 2016.The American people clearly rejects The GOP’s attempts to exploit the death of our Ambassador and 3 fellow Americans for political gain.

 

[futurecurrents]

HOLY FUCK!!!!!!!!!!!! That man asked for additional security!!!!! The two former SEALs BOTH asked for additional security. I absolutely CANNOT believe I just read what I did!!!! You're a no good faggot who DESERVES to install heaters, and live a MISERABLE life!!! The man is dead! He was beaten unmercifully, sodomized, murdered, then dragged through the streets by the VERY SAME muslims Onazi supports, and yet, you support the FUCKING WHORE who did nothing when this now-dead man asked for additional security/help! You're a sick pile of shit! Here! Go and take a look at what happened to the man who asked for help!!!

[/img]

See how he's still alive (arm moving) and naked from the waist down, and being thrown around by muslims just like your "God" Onazi?? Take a look mother fucker! I WISH I would have had you in Iraq so I could shove your face in the rotting remains of people who were killed by muslim terrorists!!!! And after I had you puking up your shoes, I'd beat you so bad, your brains would run out of your ears, you nazi son of a bitch!

Yes, and Stevens bares some responsibility because he refused to have military security because he felt it would hurt the trust of the locals.

But by all means.....rant away with your fucked up Faux News fed delusions. Clinton did nothing wrong.

Wow you're douchebag.

 

[Tecumseh Sherman]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/10/jason-chaffetz-embassy_n_1954912.html

Jason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security

Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) acknowledged on Wednesday that House Republicans had consciously voted to reduce the funds allocated to the State Department for embassy security since winning the majority in 2010.

On Wednesday morning, CNN anchor Soledad O'Brien asked the Utah Republican if he had "voted to cut the funding for embassy security."

"Absolutely," Chaffetz said. "Look we have to make priorities and choices in this country. We have…15,000 contractors in Iraq. We have more than 6,000 contractors, a private army there, for President Obama, in Baghdad. And we’re talking about can we get two dozen or so people into Libya to help protect our forces. When you’re in tough economic times, you have to make difficult choices. You have to prioritize things.”

For the past two years, House Republicans have continued to deprioritize the security forces protecting State Department personnel around the world. In fiscal year 2011, lawmakers shaved $128 million off of the administration's request for embassy security funding. House Republicans drained off even more funds in fiscal year 2012 -- cutting back on the department's request by $331 million.





<iframe src="//www.youtube.com/embed/XB4duL1xMmY" allowfullscreen="" width="560" frameborder="0" height="315"></iframe>

 

[LEAPup]

And btw,, do you support voter ID when voting for the President of the US? You shouldn't, being a nazi, but as we ALL know, the tyrant received millions of votes from the dead...

 

[futurecurrents]

"U.S. envoy Chris Stevens refused offers of more security before the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Libya in which he was killed, McClatchy Newspapers reported.

"In light of the uncertain security environment, US Mission Benghazi will submit specific requests to US Embassy Tripoli for additional physical security upgrades and staffing needs by separate cover," said the cable, which was first reported by Fox News.

Rather than wait for the second cable, however, Army Gen. Carter Ham, then-commander of the U.S. Africa Command, called Stevens and asked if the embassy needed a special security team, the officials said. Stevens told Ham it did not, the government officials said.
During a meeting several weeks later, Ham again asked Stevens if he wanted additional military security and again Stevens said no, the officials told McClatchy.
"He didn't say why. He just turned it down," one official said, speaking anonymously.
McClatchy said the offer of aid and Stevens' refusal were not revealed in either the State Department's Accountability Review Board investigation of the Benghazi events or during congressional hearings and reports issued into what happened Sept. 11, 2011, when the consulate was stormed and Stevens and three other diplomatic staffers were killed."

http://www.military.com/daily-news/2013/05/15/official-amb-stevens-refused-additional-security.html


So, Leap, douchebag, I expect an apology.

 

[Tecumseh Sherman]

Rumsfeld Asserts Embassy Attacks Due To “Perceived American Weakness.” Wait, How Many Embassy Attacks Were There Under Bush?

Number of embassy attacks under Bush? Twelve, the most in history.



Yesterday, former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld tweeted that Mitt Romney was right to say the tragic attacks on U.S. embassies in Benghazi on Tuesday were the result of perceived American weakness:

Which is an excellent point. If Bush and Rumsfeld were in charge, the world would know who was boss, and these attacks never would have happened. Just look at their record!! No one dared to attack a U.S. diplomatic facility when they were running the show. Right? That’s right, isn’t it? We assume the number of embassy attacks under Bush must be zero, right? Or at least, fewer than under Obama? Or at least not the most in American history, right? Let’s Google it just to be sure, though…

Yeah, no. Actually, there were twelve terrorist attacks on U.S. diplomatic facilities abroad during George W. Bush’s tenure — the most of any U.S. president in history — and eight of those attacks occurred under Donald Rumsfeld’s watch.

The embassy breaches on Tuesday marked the second attack on U.S. diplomatic facilities during President Obama’s tenure, including one in April 2010 in Pakistan which was in retaliation for drone attacks there (if one counts the attacks in Libya, Egypt, and Yemen separately even though they occurred at roughly the same time and arose from the same incident, the total during his presidency is four). Even after Osama bin Laden’s death, America’s diplomatic facilities did not come under fire.

The total number of deaths from attacks on U.S. diplomatic facilities was 60 during the Bush administration and 13 under President Obama. The greatest number of deaths occurred during Clinton’s presidency, though all 223 of these deaths occurred on a single day in 1998, the result of in coordinated al Qaeda attacks on the U.S. embassies in Tanzania and Kenya.

Ah, but perhaps Benghazi marks the first time a U.S. diplomat was killed at one of our facilities? Maybe that’s why Rumsfeld has been so quick to point fingers?Also, no. In 2006, a suicide bomber targeted and killed U.S. diplomat David Foy outside the U.S. Consulate in Karachi. The attack marked the third terrorist incident at that particular Consulate in under four years.

But diplomat, schmiplomat. Isn’t this the first time a U.S. ambassador has been assassinated abroad? Still no. Militants have killed U.S. ambassadors on five previous occasions, including two at U.S. diplomatic facilities.

But surely this must mark the first time terrorists have actually breached a U.S. diplomatic facility, right? Again, no. In 2004, for instance, militant Islamists successfully breached the U.S. Consulate in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, taking 28 people hostage and ultimately killing five consulate staff and four security guards.