...
Bansky is a current artist, but he has already made a name for himself and sells stuff you can actually put in your house...
Until it self-destructs at some random time in your home, and becomes worth 50x what you bought it for. Brilliant!
...
Bansky is a current artist, but he has already made a name for himself and sells stuff you can actually put in your house...
As art, its absolute crap. Nobody needs to own a 256 color BMP or GIF that looks like its from the 80's.NFT collecting as art and investment mindset
As art, its absolute crap. Nobody needs to own a 256 color BMP or GIF that looks like its from the 80's.
As a token to say "look how rich I am since I can spend millions on this worthless garbage", then yes, I can see the utility there. We do after all see runway models walking down the runway wearing the most god-awful and impractical outfits that they would never dare be seen wearing in public.
Hearing these guys talk as if they discovered the next Picasso is hilarious. Everyone here is definitely drinking the cool aid. The only way they can back up their thesis is by way of saying how much money is plowing into the crypto market.
Now I'm not saying the idea behind NFT is bad, there is utility there, but the absolute garbage that people are spending thousands of dollars on is insane. Like who cares if a bear is wearing a scarf or has glasses. The cryptopunks are even worse.
The thing is that they also know the rug will be pulled out from this NFT market. The game is very simple. Sell it to the next sucker for a much higher price. Now I'm not against this game, but I am against calling this art and concluding that there is some value to it.
Looking extensively at the trades, its obvious to me that during this recent dip of the past couple of days, you had guys dumping for a loss who were just wanting to make a quick buck. I see that most bears or other things from these collections have yet to sell for an insane price, hence some are essentially worthless at this point. They are simply being held, hoping that someone takes the bait. There is some very big money here that is pretty much running the whole show.
I also see lots of transfers vs. sales. Perhaps one owner has multiple accounts and needs to move stuff around, like having different brokerage accounts. But it could also very well be a way to drum up the illusion of sales. I can agree to sell to my friend for 3 ETH and he will sell his to me. Neither of us has lost money, but we generated volume, perception of value, and hopefully future sales.
I think the odds of winning are perhaps much better than Vegas, so that has an appeal right there, but lets not forget this is a game, a Ponzi scheme, and when it crashes, it will be epic.
Only if someone is stupid enough to pay 100 ETH for something that you got for 0.1 ETHAnyone who missed out on bitcoin, ethereum, solana, cardano, matic, link, etc, etc...
NFT's could be another chance at life-changing profits. Very risky...