I don't happen to need a gross of random idiots...
Just wanted to mention that you have posted a word in a context that nearly nobody in this thread understood. Stop exfoliating your elder lexicon usage onto the masses. Waste of talent.
I don't happen to need a gross of random idiots...
I see a premium on puts vs calls that's not insignificant and it ties up less BP. What strike did you get assigned?
Just wanted to mention that you have posted a word in a context that nearly nobody in this thread understood. Stop exfoliating your elder lexicon usage onto the masses. Waste of talent.
Sir, this is NOT a Wendy's.
![]()
No no, it means exactly what I know it means. You are scraping off obscure usages of words onto the audience, and I am saying it is a waste of time here.
I thought you knew me better than that, ON. I talk how I talk... although I do pay some attention to the audience, I like precision in communication. No, I'm not showing off - gawd, what a baroque idea that is - but simply using the right word in the right place. Otherwise, I could have just referred to the OP as an apogenous, bovaristic, coprolalial, dasypygal, excerebrose, facinorous, gnathonic, hircine, ithyphallic, jumentous, kyphotic, labrose, mephitic, napiform, oligophrenial, papuliferous, quisquilian, rebarbative, saponaceous, thersitical, unguinous, ventripotent, wlatsome, xylocephalous, yirning zoophyte [1]. Instead, I kept to the subject matter. Besides... since when is "a gross" any more obscure than "a dozen"???
You also missed the earlier use of that word in this thread which makes this usage doubly appropriate.
[1] OK, fine - I stole that from elsewhere. But I actually know what each of them means, so...

Ahh, so you own this book. Doesn't surprise me.![]()
Broken icon there, but I assume you mean the one by Peter Bowler. Nope - I got there a bit more indirectly.
Sorry, URL was unwieldy.
How's this?
Take a look inside, I think they have the whole foreward.

Still broken, but I've looked his book up on Amazon. Oooh, it is fun!![]()