Why didn't some of the "yes" voters say they would be a "no".. simply because it was not a bi-partisan bill, it was crafted behind closed doors, and the public was against the bill (by what, 3:1)?
If the elected representatives were actually representing their voters, there should have been enough "no" votes to prevent passage.
And.. all of this Executive Order business... waaaayyyy too much power in the hands of one man. Works to defeat the intended "checks and balances" objectives of our government structure.
Hopefully, hosed voters will remember all of this come November. Personally, I'd like to see every "yes" voter defeated soundly.