But there can be no question that Trumps is clinical.
Okay. but you are not questioning whether his wife is hot or not are you?
But there can be no question that Trumps is clinical.
But there can be no question that Trumps is clinical.
In you explore this, I think you will find more or less a general agreement among those who were close to Reagan that during his second term he exhibited symptoms of dementia. I don't think it's slander to point this out; it's factual, according to those who knew Reagan well.The slander that Ronald Reagan was incapacitated by dementia in his second term is also a liberal fantasy, motivated by a sick desire to tear down the legacy of our greatest modern president.
I'm not old enough to remember any of FDR's fireside chats. But if you say so.In that case so was FDRs. FDR used radio broadcasts in the same way Trump uses tweets -- to belittle his opponents. Just a different medium of communication in another era.
No, There are somethings that are unquestionably true.Okay. but you are not questioning whether his wife is hot or not are you?
I'm not old enough to remember any of FDR's fireside chats. But if you say so.
Well you are replying to me by putting "quality of EO's" in quotes but I dont see in my words where I said that- or does that not matter if you just feel like assigning it to me. I don't know, maybe you meant quantity and/or are referring to someone else and I am just not following. Quite possible.
Anyway, yes, we disagree. I make a big distinction between a lawful EO and one that tries to implement something that only congress can implement. Your chart shows that you are of the ilk that I mentioned: ie. somehow executive orders are inherently good or bad so just show the number. That's a dumbed down view. If a president only issues one a year and it is dangerously unconstitutional then that is a yuge problem even though the number is low. On the other hand, if a president gets a burr under his saddle about the filthy restrooms at the national parks and issues a dozen executive orders to fix it and similar problems that are clearly within the scope of the executive branch, the I think it means next to nothing in terms of numbers. But you like the bumper stick approach. That's fine.
Remind me again of the unconstitutional EO's struck down by the courts during Obama's term? Because Trump has at least one already.