This is a special case and special cases create precedent.
"In the Land of the Blind, even the person with just one eye is considered to be insane."
Trump might have just one eye. Nevertheless. The special case is that hillary lost.
This is a special case and special cases create precedent.
Am I personally being offensive and insulting to you AAAintheBeltway or are you referring to just Humphrey's concern?
Regan got through his presidency but he died, of Alzheimer's disease. People concerns were founded in reality but the disease can be quick or slow in progression.
In his core he (Regan) was a good guy, he was liked and respected by most. I once had a golf club chat with Tip O'Neil just after he retired and he respected him (the democrat Speaker). Regan said that if the whitehouse doctors declared him medically unfit, he would resign. I actually think he would have, I don't think Trump will.
However... the discussion is not Hillary/Trump whataboutism, it is about whether in 2017, when we have MRI scanners etc. so we can just see exactly what is up, do we accept the risk.
Dementia does not care about party. This is about risk management and conservatives used to be the perceived rational ones on this subject.
This is beyond ridiculous. It's offensive and insulting.
I do find it fascinating that the same people who hissed at stories questioning Hillary's health after we saw with our own eyes repeated signs that something was wrong with her, now think a duly elected president should perhaps be tossed from office based on some subjective examination. The 25th Amendment is a bit troubling in itself, as it is a Pandora's box, but it was clearly intended for a situation where the president was obviously incapacitated.
The slander that Ronald Reagan was incapacitated by dementia in his second term is also a liberal fantasy, motivated by a sick desire to tear down the legacy of our greatest modern president. He was old but he had enough going for him to rescue our economy, turn the country around and win the Cold War. He survived an attack from a crazed assassin who managed to pump a bullet into him at point blank range under the noses of the Secret Service, them cracked jokes in the ER while fighting for his life. He was a man's man, a worthy representative of the Greatest Generation, not some doddering old fool.
Greatest modern president? That fool set the precedent for modern day outrageous debts, deficits and military industrial complex spending.He was also quite liberal on some issues y'all whine about today like amnesty,creating the Obama phone and having some people not pay federal taxes.
Political discussions also.If I were to make a comment either way* on his economic policy we would never get back to is suspected Altzeimer's something we need to have medically assessed.
.
In zen, they also say, "the zen you find in the temple, is the zen you bring."
Would you believe it, the NYTimes too:
Zen and the Art of Coping With Alzheimer's
http://www.nytimes.com/ref/health/healthguide/esn-alzheimers-ess.html
Am I personally being offensive and insulting to you AAAintheBeltway or are you referring to just Humphrey's concern?
I suppose more the latter but you saw fit to start a thread about it. The fact that you do not like someone or find his speech cadence annoying is not grounds to subject him to medical tests as a prelude to removal from office. Surely you must understand that the vast majority of Trump voters would see it as a coup, whatever some panel of doctors said.
I find it ironic that a congress populated by the likes of John McCain, Maxine Waters, Nancy Pelosi and others who either have brain issues or are exhibiting signs thereof would be sitting in judgment on a president who has shown no such signs at all. He is a New York real estate mogul and is not a fan of nuanced communications. Deal with it.
