Overnight- there was a huge negative divergence between those 2 tops a month apart. That plus the s&p and dow were not even close to being in the same boat... it was there to fuck with us (i got sucked in for a min, buying at the new ath, before bailing pretty quickly).
Yes, I did notice how the NQ has been a bit more whacked than the two other majors in movement. But the whack was there.
I am always surprised at how everyone buys the arbitrary definition of a bear market to be 20%. That’s just a made up number that the market itself has no knowledge of. Some dude at goldman sachs (i think it was there) used it so that others could understand what he meant by a big drop. It’s been the arbitrary standard since. Not that it’s a special dividing line. 2015-2016 had more elements of being in a bear market than anyone gives credit to.
The real problem I am having with this "percentage-move" shit is that for traders, it is not the percentage move that matters, it is the number of points.
I was going to post some more detailed comparison charts about it, but everyone can do the research themselves...
Here's how many points the NQ lost during the 50% crash in 2008... Just over a thousand...
Here's how many points NQ lost in the Feb correction of 10%...Just nearly a thousand...
So 30 years ago, a 1000 point-drop was a 50% crash. Sure. But today, it is a 10% correction.
This is assuming the point values on NQ futures remain the same, and have been as they are today since the NQ future was first open for trading.
As such, a trader may be able to handle a 50% crash when a 50% drop meant the price moves only 1,000 points down. But these days, a 50% crash in NQ would mean ~3,750 points, which is ~75 grand, not just 20 grand for the 1,000 point drops of 30 years ago.
Oh, and notice something else about the comparisons...
How long did it take the first chart to recover it's losses? 4 years.
How long did it take this year? 4 months. WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Last edited:
