Have all the anti-gun-rights twits finished starting new threads?

Even when given quotes and links I see reality's bounced off of your thick skull yet again. :p
Quote from IShopAtPublix:

Federalist papers were a propaganda tool advocating for the ratification of Constitution after it was written and adopted. One of the issues of the day was the fear that Federal government will overpower the states, (laughable I know). Madison here is trying to assuage those fears.

He talked about a large standing federal army to ridicule the fears of people who thought federal governments could overpower the states not as a concept in and of itself. Militia in the 2nd amendment talks about protection of the country (from outside forces) not protection from federal government.

Section I article 8 also talks about calling up a militia. There is absolutely no reason to talk about a militia when you want people to have an individual right.
 
Quote from RedDuke:

You sounded so confident that you will be able to protect yourself. What kind of gun do you own?
Thankfully the dregs 99cent & IQ47 are not my neighbors.


When I was a student at MCG I heard gunfire every night literally.

One night when we were studying til about 2am on campus I might add (next to the projects of course ) . The only thing that kept them from stealing my truck was a dead battery. That's gotta be depressing for a "N" to realize he's stealing from somebody poorer than himself and has to walk away empty handed.
 
Quote from Lucrum:

Calling Red Duke, IshopatKroger and futurecurrrents (who has me on ignore)

You three guys should be the ones masterdebating each other.

Red Duke wants to ban all long guns except side by sides, which includes futurecurrents lever action 30-30.

futurecurrents wants to ban anything with more than a five round capacity and all handguns, which includes Red Duke's 9mm

(if I'm not mistaken)The grocery store guy wants to ban all firearms including Red Duke and futturecurrent's firearms.

So instead of bloviating with me and the others, who are not advocating taking away ANY law abiding citizen's rights.

You should be disusing amongst yourselves as to which of your proposed infringements on the 2nd amendment you unanimously agree to implement.

You guys are your own worst enemies, and you don't even realize it.

I do not have anyone on ignore, if I do not like someone, I just stop replying to their posts.

Did you really missed my point? When I said that hand guns with 10 bullets clips are more than enough to protect oneselves, this was my opinion and just an example. I do not have a perfect answer, just few ideas that I listed earlier on other threads. The one thing that know for sure is that the current system is broken, and if nothing is done these mass shootings will continue.
 
Quote from Lucrum:

He doesn't own any.

Wow, he seems like such a strong supporter of 2nd amendment and does not even own a fire arm. If he confirms this, I will stop respond to any of his posts on this subject.

This reminds me of 2 of my relatives who were fiercely debating about their presidential candidates, yet they never even voted once in their lives.
 
Here is a good video that explains the difference between a select fire full-auto assault rifle, a semi-auto rifle, and the effectiveness of a 10 round magazine limit.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/8C-CLsMRcA0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Quote from RedDuke:

Wow, he seems like such a strong supporter of 2nd amendment and does not even own a fire arm. If he confirms this, I will stop respond to any of his posts on this subject.

I am a very strong supporter of the 2nd Amendment and I don't need some asswipe like you trying to deprive me of my rights .
That doesn't make any difference if I have zero guns or 100 guns.

It's not like I've never fired a gun.
I can and have broken the m-60 machine gun down and reassembled it in the complete dark Once a Time Ago.

I can assure you if I buy a gun it would be the type that would make "Ishop" pee his pants just standing next to him with it in the holster.
 
Quote from Tom B:

Here is a good video that explains the difference between a select fire full-auto assault rifle, a semi-auto rifle, and the effectiveness of a 10 round magazine limit.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/8C-CLsMRcA0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Bravo for posting a video which clearly details exactly what I have been saying to the anti-gun folks on this forum all along. I am curious, to hear Red Duke and the liberal brigade respond to this video.
 
Quote from RedDuke:

The one thing that know for sure is that the current system is broken, and if nothing is done these mass shootings will continue.

The mass shootings have nothing to do with current firearm legislation and are driven by a much deeper rooted issue.
 
Quote from RedDuke:

The one thing that know for sure is that the current system is broken, and if nothing is done these mass shootings will continue.
Since there's a price to be paid for gun free zones , I'm okay with that.
 
Quote from RedDuke:

I do not have anyone on ignore
Who said you did? I said futurecurrents has me on ignore.

Did you really missed my point? When I said that hand guns with 10 bullets clips are more than enough to protect oneselves, this was my opinion and just an example. I do not have a perfect answer, just few ideas that I listed earlier on other threads. The one thing that know for sure is that the current system is broken, and if nothing is done these mass shootings will continue.
Our present "system" IS the 22,000 federal state and local forearms laws/restrictions/limitations that mass murderers have never do not and never will abide by. And yet all you guys want to do is add even more silly restrictions that will also be utterly ignored by anyone and everyone bent on committing a mass murder. You might as well erect a chicken wire roof over your deck expecting it to keep the rain out. Using that analogy your "solution" seems to be adding another layer of chicken wire assuming it will somehow work better than the first layer.

Again, our problem is not the guns, it's the people misusing them.

And like it or not, futurecurrents and that grocery story guy DO want too ban your 9mm. Because they like you think they know what everyone else needs/should/should not have. You OK with that?
 
Back
Top