Letting stupid people have guns, is comparable to letting drunks drive a car.
What we need is more regulations, banning dumbasses from being allowed to handle firearms!
How's that for a workable compromise?
Have all the anti-gun-rights twits finished starting new threads?
- Thread starter PHOENIX TRADING
- Start date
Letting stupid people have guns, is comparable to letting drunks drive a car.
What we need is more regulations, banning dumbasses from being allowed to handle firearms!
How's that for a workable compromise?
I think we need to ban public schools , if they were not there none of the children would be dead.
Instead they were herded like good lil sheep into enclosures which they could not easily escape.
Lambs left to slaughter as it were by govt decree.
Sometimes you get what you pay for, and sometimes you get it hard & good.
It's just too GD funny those with the same twit mentality that fails to protect the sheep is all upset and thinks more regulations are the answer.
Who's "everyone"? Your pussified liberal control-freak friends who wet their panties like you do at the thought of citizens exercising their Constitutional RIGHT to keep and bear arms? Do you grasp that the class of semi-automatic firearms goes beyond "assault weapons" and includes many pistols, shotguns and hunting rifles? Because if you think there's any chance of banning all those, that's about as naive as your ridiculous claim that making bombs requires great skill and purchases on the internet which "would have men in black at your door in days." 
But even if we did attempt such a ban, what makes you think criminals would comply? Or that unconstitutional restrictions on law abiding citizens would stop gun crime which by definition is committed by criminals? Or that revolvers and speed loaders couldn't be used instead? No, the problem is people not inanimate objects. Guns in the United States are overwhelmingly used for hunting, recreation and DEFENSIVE purposes. The fact that the biggest killer of U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan is IEDs proves that improvised explosive devices can be a lot more effective for OFFENSIVE purposes than small arms. Which means, dumbass, that someone hell bent on mass killings can do arbitrarily more of it with a little creativity than with an AR-15 that you foam at the mouth about. Furthermore, they don't even need to be there as they would with a rifle because they could use cell phones to detonate from anywhere in the world with a signal. Screw C4, plenty of improvised explosive devices that are easier to detonate can be cooked up by almost anyone and the fact that you know less about it than children with sparklers do, doesn't negate that. But forget about explosives. Look at what a little creativity and box cutters accomplished. Or have your mommy explain what a little imagination and gasoline and matches could do. The possibilities are endless. The point is, the common denominator of people killing is PEOPLE. And because there's no limit on ways to kill, unconstitutional fairy tale notions about banning only one avenue won't even stop killings with that avenue (guns) let alone others. The first step in solving any problem is correctly identifying it. And that problem is people. More specifically, mental illness and our rotting culture. Targeting the wrong people and objects not only won't solve the problem, it will make it easier for the predators to prey on their victims. Maybe your mommy can explain the stats on Australia that were posted and which simply bounced off your thick skull. If that doesn't work, then seek professional help for chronic reality deficit disorder. 
But even if we did attempt such a ban, what makes you think criminals would comply? Or that unconstitutional restrictions on law abiding citizens would stop gun crime which by definition is committed by criminals? Or that revolvers and speed loaders couldn't be used instead? No, the problem is people not inanimate objects. Guns in the United States are overwhelmingly used for hunting, recreation and DEFENSIVE purposes. The fact that the biggest killer of U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan is IEDs proves that improvised explosive devices can be a lot more effective for OFFENSIVE purposes than small arms. Which means, dumbass, that someone hell bent on mass killings can do arbitrarily more of it with a little creativity than with an AR-15 that you foam at the mouth about. Furthermore, they don't even need to be there as they would with a rifle because they could use cell phones to detonate from anywhere in the world with a signal. Screw C4, plenty of improvised explosive devices that are easier to detonate can be cooked up by almost anyone and the fact that you know less about it than children with sparklers do, doesn't negate that. But forget about explosives. Look at what a little creativity and box cutters accomplished. Or have your mommy explain what a little imagination and gasoline and matches could do. The possibilities are endless. The point is, the common denominator of people killing is PEOPLE. And because there's no limit on ways to kill, unconstitutional fairy tale notions about banning only one avenue won't even stop killings with that avenue (guns) let alone others. The first step in solving any problem is correctly identifying it. And that problem is people. More specifically, mental illness and our rotting culture. Targeting the wrong people and objects not only won't solve the problem, it will make it easier for the predators to prey on their victims. Maybe your mommy can explain the stats on Australia that were posted and which simply bounced off your thick skull. If that doesn't work, then seek professional help for chronic reality deficit disorder. ^ In other words, 666 gets his virility from his guns and he likes feeling potent. A regular rifle or shotgun just won't do. It would make his dick shrink.
I've never understood the excitement they get out of guns, looking at gun magazines, talking about guns. Seems like an expensive hobby to me. And I know a lot of guys who just buy guns, don't go to the shooting range, don't go hunting, just buy guns for the fun of it. My Armageddon plan for when the zombies attack, I'll just go borrow a gun from a buddy to help kill the zombies. I've got a gun, but not the serious fire power it'll take to fight zombies.
Well then it's mighty good that you are a brain dead liberal zombie then eh?
everybody knows brain dead zombies don't use guns
Well at least I'm not making up tales about donkey's like BSAM.