Have all the anti-gun-rights twits finished starting new threads?

[Lucrum]

Quote from RedDuke:

It has nothing to do with having lots of money. It is a way to be able to protect yourself when transporting cash to the bank....

My mistake, I guess I misread.

Quote from RedDuke:

That's what I thought, same as NYC. You can only get a carry if... you own cash business (but it is still limited).

I still don't see why EVERYONE wouldn't have the right. To enjoy their 2nd amendment RIGHT to carry though.

 

[bigarrow]

Quote from RedDuke:

I am done responding to you, since all you can do is insults. Learn some manners first.

I'm about done with those guys too RedDuke.

 

[RedDuke]

Quote from bigarrow:

I'm about done with those guys too RedDuke.

I have no problem with people not agreeing with me or having a totally different view. However, I have noticed that once few of these posters start running out of arguments, or when I say something that pisses them off, it always ends up with some kind of an insult.

 

[pspr]

Quote from Lucrum:

I still don't see why EVERYONE wouldn't have the right. To enjoy their 2nd amendment RIGHT to carry though.

Absolutely. I don't like getting robbed or assaulted either. Why wouldn't I be afforded the same protections?

Thank God that the Founders realized there were zealots like RedDuke, et al who would have the populace disarm at the risk of losing freedom. I know they will laugh at that statement but it is only because they are not very bright and don't know history or decide to ignore it.

We have a right guaranteed by the Constitution and all their yammering and stomping of feet isn't going to change that.

 

[RedDuke]

Quote from Lucrum:

My mistake, I guess I misread.



I still don't see why EVERYONE wouldn't have the right. To enjoy their 2nd amendment RIGHT to carry though.

2nd amendment gives me the right to bear arms, then state and local governments can define what is allowed/appropriate and what is not for a particular area.

Let's say concealed carry is vital to me feeling secure, there is absolutely nothing that stops me from leaving NYC and moving to Pennsylvania for example.

I happen to love NYC and feel safe without a gun on me, it is my choice.

If carry would be so important to residents, then they would outvote current legislators and elect the new ones who would change the laws.

I personally would not like to live in a city where every other person carries a gun. Too many people are dumb and careless.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from RedDuke:

....2nd amendment gives me the right to bear arms, then state and local governments can define what is allowed/appropriate and what is not for a particular area.

According to the SCOTUS I think, the 2nd amendment doesn't say that so far as I'm aware.

If carry would be so important to residents, then they would outvote current legislators and elect the new ones who would change the laws.

In theory that is how it should work. In practice, not always.

I personally would not like to live in a city where every other person carries a gun. Too many people are dumb and careless.

But you're OK with the criminals being armed?

How about the police?

 

[RedDuke]

Quote from pspr:

Absolutely. I don't like getting robbed or assaulted either. Why wouldn't I be afforded the same protections?

Thank God that the Founders realized there were zealots like RedDuke, et al who would have the populace disarm at the risk of losing freedom. I know they will laugh at that statement but it is only because they are not very bright and don't know history or decide to ignore it.

We have a right guaranteed by the Constitution and all their yammering and stomping of feet isn't going to change that.

I happen to study history a lot. Btw, one of my favorite subjects.

I said it before, and will repeat it again, Semi automatic AR15 and the like will not help against government should it turn against citizens. The weapons that might help, are prohibited from hands of citizens already. It is not me not being bright, it is you who are naive and a bit brain washed.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from RedDuke:

I happen to study history a lot. Btw, one of my favorite subjects.

I said it before, and will repeat it again, Semi automatic AR15 and the like will not help against government should it turn against citizens....

Then I'll repeat it again. They would absolutely make a difference and they're essential to help avoid government tyranny.


I also enjoy history BTW, predominantly military history.

 

[RedDuke]

Quote from Lucrum:

In theory that is how it should work. In practice, not always.


But you're OK with the criminals being armed?

How about the police?

Unfortunately, you are absolutely correct about the process.

Of course I am not, but criminals do not care about any laws. That being said, most of armed robberies end up without any casualties. Criminals usually interested in getting your wallet and not shooting you.

Let's say you have a gun, but someone comes from the back and points a gun at you and ask for your wallet. You won't even have a chance to use your gun. As he back away, would you pull a gun and try to shoot him?

 

[PHOENIX TRADING]

Quote from Lucrum:

According to the SCOTUS I think, the 2nd amendment doesn't say that so far as I'm aware.In theory that is how it should work. In practice, not always.


But you're OK with the criminals being armed?

How about the police?

In general I think the police are criminals too.