Someone told me he also said the casualty rate is seven Ukrainians to one Russian.
Was that in those documents too? I just looked at your Yahoo link, I didn't see that.
If true, that sure doesn't sound like what we've been hearing.
Has the newly arrested military leaker gone full trans yet or is it too soon?
- Thread starter TreeFrogTrader
- Start date
Was that in those documents too? I just looked at your Yahoo link, I didn't see that.
If true, that sure doesn't sound like what we've been hearing.
"racket news" lol. They're even mocking you w/the name and you're too dumb to see it.
The casualty figures are bogus. Anyway, the classified documents supposedly state that there were 80,000 Russian casualties and only 16,000 Ukrainian casualties. Can you believe that utter BS? I do not buy it because Ursula Von Der Leyen like months ago, said in a speech (scrubbed her speech clean of Ukrainian casualties) said there were 150,000 dead Ukrainian soldiers. Now, Russian attacks with artillery, rockets, bombs, missiles have escalated everywhere. What are the chances there are more dead Ukrainian soldiers now, on top of the 150,000 Von Der Leyen mentioned with her slip in her speech? The Ukrainian envoy to the United Kingdom said Ukrainian casualties were horrific and will be revealed when the war ends. Weapons inspector Scott Ritter put the figure above 400,000 dead Ukrainians as Colonel Douglas MacGregor as well. Both have contacts in the military as compared to most hacks on cable tv and extreme liberal media propagandists pulling figures out of their asses. The Ukrainian war is going pretty badly for Ukraine.
They probably, leaked the so called classified information to try and fool the Russians. Just shows you how amateurish these fools are at the top echelons of the Biden administration and their legions of lackeys. Russians are laughing it off. Take note, in this time and age where spy satellites are plentiful for the Chinese, Russians and the Americans, what are the chances they even need any information on say, incoming heavy weapons to Ukraine? Russians know where the heavy weapons are coming in and where it is being deployed. Otherwise, how could the Russians target them on the battlefield? Both Ukraine and Russia use drones to spy on each other's positions, on top of it.
I went back and watched that episode. It's on YT. He did in fact say that.
But the question is... is it true?
I'm surprised GWB hasn't responded yet.
That in and upon itself is scary.... ie it might be true.
Well there's Tucker, and there's Paul Ryan on the board, and Rupert Murdoch the owner. Tucker pulls good numbers for them, so they keep him even though they themselves may be rich opinionated globalists who hate Putin because the CIA says they should.
Think about it. Who would know the absolute truth? I would trust Scott Ritter a former weapons inspector of nuclear missiles and Colonel Douglas MacGregor who served in the US armed forces and like Scott Ritter has contacts in the military. Both of these guys are patriots because they are willing to take the heat for their comments when, it would be so easy to be just a mouthpiece like other retired generals and get paid handsomely by the networks. Most of the so called analysts on Cable TV, repeat word for word the official line of Joe Biden, his advisers and NATO officials as if, it is the truth. What they are all reporting is not news but, propaganda. Nobody bothers to fact check these guys at the very top.
What Tucker told us is an example of an actual fact being presented so as to invite interpretation as a non-factual, alternative fact. It is a fact that there are American ex-military fighting in Ukraine, presumably on Ukraine's side. Tucker was right when he said "There are American Soldiers fighting in Ukraine." That is a fact! They are soldiers because they are fighting with or in conjunction with official Ukraine forces. They are American because they are American Citizens. That makes them "American Soldiers." The detail Tucker left out was that these American Soldiers who are fighting in Ukraine are not on active duty with American armed forces. This is a detail that makes the difference between fact and its non-factual, alternative interpretation.
I am impressed by the selflessness of some Americans who have chosen to risk their lives by finding a way to get themselves to Ukraine and fight on behalf of the Ukrainians. I am a little chagrined, however, by reports of some of these soldiers not acting honorably.
Am I surprised at Tucker? Not one bit. It would be pointless for him to try and regain his integrity. He irretrievably lost it a long time ago. Once a person loses their integrity it is very difficult to regain it. In Tucker's case, this would be impossible.
https://www.culawreview.org/journal...merican-volunteers-in-the-russo-ukrainian-war
I am impressed by the selflessness of some Americans who have chosen to risk their lives by finding a way to get themselves to Ukraine and fight on behalf of the Ukrainians. I am a little chagrined, however, by reports of some of these soldiers not acting honorably.
Am I surprised at Tucker? Not one bit. It would be pointless for him to try and regain his integrity. He irretrievably lost it a long time ago. Once a person loses their integrity it is very difficult to regain it. In Tucker's case, this would be impossible.
https://www.culawreview.org/journal...merican-volunteers-in-the-russo-ukrainian-war
Last edited: