Trump is being investigated by his own DOJ.
There is not even a DOJ investigation against Clinton by Trump's DOJ.
Eat that logic, Con.
Haiti Accuses Trump of Laundering Money for Former Dictator 'Baby Doc' Duvalier.
- Thread starter exGOPer
- Start date
Trump is being investigated by his own DOJ.
There is not even a DOJ investigation against Clinton by Trump's DOJ.
Eat that logic, Con.
Who cares?
Apple is investing 350 Billion (with a B) in the U.S.
AMZN is building a new HQ that is estimated to add $38 Billion to some local economy and create 53,000 jobs.
Chrysler is bring back truck production.
ISIS is being stamped out.
Kim is singing "Kumbyya" over there with SK.
Iran is on the verge of regime change.
Working Americans are getting $1000's in bonuses.
Toyota's building another factory.
Illegals crossing the boarder are at all time lows....
Military moral is off the charts...
I mean really. Who gives a fuck what he did?
I hope he does a few more porn stars and calls a few more country's shitholes.
I want our grandkids to have a better life and achieve greater things.
So they can pay hookers. And call shitholes shitholes.
Worry about our country for Christsake.
EDIT: I forgot to mention 8000 DOW points.
Last edited:
Those tax cuts are adding 300 billion to the deficit PER YEAR and that's structural - means they will continue to add every year without spending cuts which are not going to happen.
And Iran recently voted in the moderates last year, what regime change? You want the Mullahs back?
Trump deported less Mexicans than Obama
You forgot to mention giant layoffs by Walmart, Carrier and Comcast
If you want to focus on the good things that's fine, that doesn't mean bad shit isn't happening. And by the way, economy was doing just as good under Obama, what do you think Trump was doing? Heeding your advice? See for yourself - https://www.reddit.com/r/trumpcriticizestrump
How many of those 8K pts did you capture?Who cares?
Apple is investing 350 Billion (with a B) in the U.S.
AMZN is building a new HQ that is estimated to add $38 Billion to some local economy and create 53,000 jobs.
Chrysler is bring back truck production.
ISIS is being stamped out.
Kim is singing "Kumbyya" over there with SK.
Iran is on the verge of regime change.
Working Americans are getting $1000's in bonuses.
Toyota's building another factory.
Illegals crossing the boarder are at all time lows....
Military moral is off the charts...
I mean really. Who gives a fuck what he did?
I hope he does a few more porn stars and calls a few more country's shitholes.
I want our grandkids to have a better life and achieve greater things.
So they can pay hookers. And call shitholes shitholes.
Worry about our country for Christsake.
EDIT: I forgot to mention 8000 DOW points.
Do you live in a military town? Or near the border?
Amazon is ruining the moral of hard working Americans.
Smuckers sucks!
-He's deported less Mexicans than Barack? Well there ya go. Compassion.
The point was we have less coming in. And that includes drugs.
-Taxes...you have to give it time to see what happens. Smarter minds than you and I are at work here. I'm no economist.
-Iran... they voted for more freedom.... the Persians are a very intelligent people (OMG ("rolling eyes") Zandy's a racist with a statement like that).... they know whats best for them.
-Layoffs at Wallyworld? OK now you're talking about something I know. Those jobs from Sams club will be absorbed into the main operation according to the CEO. If Sams can't beat COST, thats capitalism. Survival of the fittest. No corporate welfare
...(BB&T CEO just raised his entry level employees starting wage to $15 from $12 today btw. It was in their CC today).
-Comcast? Well Spectrum is bringing back over 20,000 jobs from overseas to TX and investing 25 Billion in infrastructure spending to bring more people broadband. How many jobs from UTX's Carrier division are leaving? 500?
Nobody gives a fuck how many points I captured off the DOW... but lets ask 100 Million average Joes with 401K's.
And wtf does Smuckers have to do with anything? Albeit I have a thread here that called it dead at $128 and another one that subsequently called it a buy at $104.
And yeah... definitely in tune with what our boys and girls in uniform are thinking these days. Moral is VERY high.
Last edited:
Less were coming in under Obama as well which is why there are less deportations
And you call this compassion?
https://www.mediaite.com/online/emo...and-family-from-viral-video-system-failed-us/
Why can't we look at history? Under Bush, the same policies failed
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/11/22/16683462/trump-tax-is-bad
Ok
We will see when it happens, their promises are not worth the paper it's written on.
no one takes politifact serious... talk the the New York Times....
Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html
here is just one part of the story...
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.
...
To judge from those disclosures — which list the contributions in ranges rather than precise amounts — the only Uranium One official to give to the Clinton Foundation was Mr. Telfer, the chairman, and the amount was relatively small: no more than $250,000, and that was in 2007, before talk of a Rosatom deal began percolating.
Photo
Uranium One’s Russian takeover was approved by the United States while Hillary Rodham Clinton was secretary of state. CreditDoug Mills/The New York Times
But a review of tax records in Canada, where Mr. Telfer has a family charity called the Fernwood Foundation, shows that he donated millions of dollars more, during and after the critical time when the foreign investment committee was reviewing his deal with the Russians. With the Russians offering a special dividend, shareholders like Mr. Telfer stood to profit.
His donations through the Fernwood Foundation included $1 million reported in 2009, the year his company appealed to the American Embassy to help it keep its mines in Kazakhstan; $250,000 in 2010, the year the Russians sought majority control; as well as $600,000 in 2011 and $500,000 in 2012. Mr. Telfer said that his donations had nothing to do with his business dealings, and that he had never discussed Uranium One with Mr. or Mrs. Clinton. He said he had given the money because he wanted to support Mr. Giustra’s charitable endeavors with Mr. Clinton. “Frank and I have been friends and business partners for almost 20 years,” he said.
The Clinton campaign left it to the foundation to reply to questions about the Fernwood donations; the foundation did not provide a response.
Mr. Telfer’s undisclosed donations came in addition to between $1.3 million and $5.6 million in contributions, which were reported, from a constellation of people with ties to Uranium One or UrAsia, the company that originally acquired Uranium One’s most valuable asset: the Kazakh mines. Without those assets, the Russians would have had no interest in the deal: “It wasn’t the goal to buy the Wyoming mines. The goal was to acquire the Kazakh assets, which are very good,” Mr. Novikov, the Rosatom spokesman, said in an interview.
Amid this influx of Uranium One-connected money, Mr. Clinton was invited to speak in Moscow in June 2010, the same month Rosatom struck its deal for a majority stake in Uranium One.
The $500,000 fee — among Mr. Clinton’s highest — was paid by Renaissance Capital, a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin that has invited world leaders, including Tony Blair, the former British prime minister, to speak at its investor conferences.
Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html
here is just one part of the story...
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.
...
To judge from those disclosures — which list the contributions in ranges rather than precise amounts — the only Uranium One official to give to the Clinton Foundation was Mr. Telfer, the chairman, and the amount was relatively small: no more than $250,000, and that was in 2007, before talk of a Rosatom deal began percolating.
Photo
Uranium One’s Russian takeover was approved by the United States while Hillary Rodham Clinton was secretary of state. CreditDoug Mills/The New York Times
But a review of tax records in Canada, where Mr. Telfer has a family charity called the Fernwood Foundation, shows that he donated millions of dollars more, during and after the critical time when the foreign investment committee was reviewing his deal with the Russians. With the Russians offering a special dividend, shareholders like Mr. Telfer stood to profit.
His donations through the Fernwood Foundation included $1 million reported in 2009, the year his company appealed to the American Embassy to help it keep its mines in Kazakhstan; $250,000 in 2010, the year the Russians sought majority control; as well as $600,000 in 2011 and $500,000 in 2012. Mr. Telfer said that his donations had nothing to do with his business dealings, and that he had never discussed Uranium One with Mr. or Mrs. Clinton. He said he had given the money because he wanted to support Mr. Giustra’s charitable endeavors with Mr. Clinton. “Frank and I have been friends and business partners for almost 20 years,” he said.
The Clinton campaign left it to the foundation to reply to questions about the Fernwood donations; the foundation did not provide a response.
Mr. Telfer’s undisclosed donations came in addition to between $1.3 million and $5.6 million in contributions, which were reported, from a constellation of people with ties to Uranium One or UrAsia, the company that originally acquired Uranium One’s most valuable asset: the Kazakh mines. Without those assets, the Russians would have had no interest in the deal: “It wasn’t the goal to buy the Wyoming mines. The goal was to acquire the Kazakh assets, which are very good,” Mr. Novikov, the Rosatom spokesman, said in an interview.
Amid this influx of Uranium One-connected money, Mr. Clinton was invited to speak in Moscow in June 2010, the same month Rosatom struck its deal for a majority stake in Uranium One.
The $500,000 fee — among Mr. Clinton’s highest — was paid by Renaissance Capital, a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin that has invited world leaders, including Tony Blair, the former British prime minister, to speak at its investor conferences.
Last edited:
right... and you believe bill did not have sexual relations with that woman.
it might be a deductive fallacy with a normal person of integrity.
With the Clintons, arguing that they might have innocently received a hundred million dollars from putin might not be a logical fallacy but it is signpost or marker for brain damage.
it might be a deductive fallacy with a normal person of integrity.
With the Clintons, arguing that they might have innocently received a hundred million dollars from putin might not be a logical fallacy but it is signpost or marker for brain damage.
I am not analyzing people's statement, I am looking at the evidence given and judging it on it's own weight.
Bill Clinton doesn't have to testify and tell me that 2008 is not 2010, he doesn't have to tell me that Hillary had no power to push all the members in the CFIUS to approve a deal - a deal noone objected to given how irrelevant it was.
And why the fuck do you keep confusing Guestra with Putin? Guestra is a CANADIAN, how many times do you have to be told that?