Haiti Accuses Trump of Laundering Money for Former Dictator 'Baby Doc' Duvalier.

Records show his condos were purchased through shell companies linked to the brutal despot.

On 7 February 1986, facing a domestic populist revolt and international pressure to step down, embattled President of Haiti Jean-Claude “Baby Doc” Duvalier, fled his country for exile in France onboard a United States Air Force jet. A New York Times obituary from 4 October 2014 described his rule over Haiti as one of “bloody brutality”, widespread corruption, and lavish excess:

When he fled Haiti, American officials said he held $200 million to $500 million in foreign bank accounts and had a reputation for giving family members million-dollar vacations at luxury resorts, as millions of Haitians lived in squalor and scrounged for food.

Once he fled, a new government in Haiti attempted recover these assets, which they believed the Duvalier regime had looted from the government and people of Haiti. A 14 July 1986 story in New York Magazine first reported that one of the assets the government of Haiti was trying to seize was an apartment in Trump Tower purchased in August 1983 through a shell corporation:

Investigators working for the new government of Haiti have uncovered what they believe is almost $5 million worth of New York real estate owned by interests linked to the family of deposed president Jean-Claude Duvalier.

These assets consist of five Manhattan apartments, including a fifty-fourth-floor Trump Tower condominium bought in August 1983 for $1.65 million. This is the first reported instance of Duvalier assets being discovered in the United States.

The apartment in question, 54K, was purchased by “Lasa Trade and Finance” and — at the time of the 1986 article — was occupied by a friend of the Duvaliers named Jean “Johnny” Sambour.

Serendipitously, thanks to a combination of late telephone bills and several checks issued to Sambour by the Treasury of Haiti, a United States law firm hired by the Government of Haiti was able to ascertain that, indeed, the apartment was owned by the Duvaliers.

Recounting his experience hunting down the assets of the Duvaliers in a 2009 New Yorker profile, prolific corporate intelligence investigator Jules Kroll (who had been hired by the U.S. law firm retained by the Haitian government) said that Duvalier’s looting from the Haitian treasury was far from subtle:

Baby Doc, Kroll said, was “not the sharpest nail in the box.” He had looted the Haitian treasury by writing big checks. “Apartment in Trump Tower?” Kroll made a show of laborious penmanship. “ ‘Trump . . . Tower.’ Even we could figure that one out.”

In March 1987, President Ronald Reagan signed an executive order freezing any U.S.-based Duvalier assets, which included — according to the New York Times — Trump Tower apartment 54K.

The tale of Duvalier’s ownership of a Trump Tower apartment gained renewed interest in January 2018, thanks to a BuzzFeed News investigation of possible money laundering by the Trump Organization, combined with Trump’s alleged derogatory comments about Haiti.

That BuzzFeed report investigated every U.S. sale of a Trump Organization or Trump-branded property since 1980 to see how many fit the U.S. Government’s criteria for possible money laundering, finding that a full 21 percent could fit that bill:

Trump condo sales that match Treasury’s characteristics of possible money laundering totaled $1.5 billion, BuzzFeed News calculated. They accounted for 21% of the 6,400 Trump condos sold in the US. Those figures include condos that Trump developed as well as condos that others developed in his name under licensing deals that pay Trump a fee or a percentage of sales. […]

The property records analyzed by BuzzFeed News would not by themselves reveal money laundering – only warning signs.

That story does mention the Duvalier incident, reporting that Trump himself signed the deed of sale for Apartment 54K in 1983, but notes that there is no evidence that the Trump Organization, or Trump personally, participated in any untoward money laundering scheme in this case.

However, as Donald Trump did sell an apartment in Trump Tower to Duvalier through a Panamanian shell corporation in 1983, we rank the claim as true.

https://www.snopes.com/trump-sold-an-apartment-haitian-dictator/
 
LOL

Conspired with Russia
Didn't want to really win
Insane/Alhzheimers/Dementia
Pussy grabber
Reporter ejector
Money launderer
Matress peeer
Racist
Lier
Racist
Racist
Pedophile
Racist

Did I miss anything?
 
LOL

Conspired with Russia
Didn't want to really win
Insane/Alhzheimers/Dementia
Pussy grabber
Reporter ejector
Money launderer
Matress peeer
Racist
Lier
Racist
Racist
Pedophile
Racist

Did I miss anything?

Yes, you missed yesterdays report about him being incestuous.

And which one of them is false? Did Haiti not accuse Trump? Yes or No.
 
...and you never heard of a false accusation right?

Nobody is disputing that Trump did sell property to the dictator using a shell corporation though. Who is claiming it's false?
 
Nobody is disputing that Trump did sell property to the dictator using a shell corporation though. Who is claiming it's false?

From your own post -That story does mention the Duvalier incident, reporting that Trump himself signed the deed of sale for Apartment 54K in 1983, but notes that there is no evidence that the Trump Organization, or Trump personally, participated in any untoward money laundering scheme in this case.

But somehow your title screams MONEY LAUNDERING.

Very similar to every other unsubstantiated claims made by the Left. They throw Molotov cocktails of accusations and then when there is no proof, it's on to the next accusation. Really pitiful actually.
 
From your own post -That story does mention the Duvalier incident, reporting that Trump himself signed the deed of sale for Apartment 54K in 1983, but notes that there is no evidence that the Trump Organization, or Trump personally, participated in any untoward money laundering scheme in this case.

But somehow your title screams MONEY LAUNDERING.

Very similar to every other unsubstantiated claims made by the Left. They throw Molotov cocktails of accusations and then when there is no proof, it's on to the next accusation. Really pitiful actually.

But when it came to Clinton's Uranium investigation you had this to say

When one "investigates" with the foregone conclusion that there's nothing to see... then indeed investigations dry up regardless of what they've discovered.

Let's just proceed with what is already known, it is way more than enough evidence of crimes.

Clinton as evidenced, never personally participated in the CFIUS decision but that was evidence enough but in this case when Trump did personally benefit and was head of the organization, he is not responsible?

Double standard don't you think?
 
You tell me why this money was sent to the Clinton Foundation and Bill Clinton. I'm sure there is a very logical innocent explanation.:sneaky:

On April 23, 2015, The New York Timeswrote about the uranium issue, saying the paper had “built upon” Schweizer’s information.

The Times detailed how the Clinton Foundation had received millions in donations from investors in Uranium One.

The donations from those with ties to Uranium One weren’t publicly disclosed by the Clinton Foundation, even though Hillary Clinton had an agreement with the White House that the foundation would disclose all contributors. Days after the Times story, the foundation acknowledged that it “made mistakes,” saying it had disclosed donations from a Canadian charity, for instance, but not the donors to that charity who were associated with the uranium company.

The Times also wrote that Bill Clinton spoke at a conference in Moscow on June 29, 2010 — which was after the Rosatom-Uranium One merger was announced in June 2010, but before it was approved by the Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States in October 2010. The Russian-based Renaissance Capital Grouporganized the conference and paid Clinton $500,000.
 
You tell me why this money was sent to the Clinton Foundation and Bill Clinton. I'm sure there is a very logical innocent explanation.:sneaky:

On April 23, 2015, The New York Timeswrote about the uranium issue, saying the paper had “built upon” Schweizer’s information.

The Times detailed how the Clinton Foundation had received millions in donations from investors in Uranium One.

The donations from those with ties to Uranium One weren’t publicly disclosed by the Clinton Foundation, even though Hillary Clinton had an agreement with the White House that the foundation would disclose all contributors. Days after the Times story, the foundation acknowledged that it “made mistakes,” saying it had disclosed donations from a Canadian charity, for instance, but not the donors to that charity who were associated with the uranium company.

The Times also wrote that Bill Clinton spoke at a conference in Moscow on June 29, 2010 — which was after the Rosatom-Uranium One merger was announced in June 2010, but before it was approved by the Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States in October 2010. The Russian-based Renaissance Capital Grouporganized the conference and paid Clinton $500,000.

That article is written by Breitbart's editor who was paid by NYT who ofcourse are fake news

As you can see in the chart, the $145 million in donations didn’t happen "while" the Russian deal was occurring in 2010. According to Clinton Cash, five donors contributed $136.4 million at or before a March 2008 benefit hosted by Giustra. While the book doesn’t specify when the other four donated to the Clinton Foundation, we were able to trace another $2.6 million to the March fundraiser.

Furthermore, the bulk of the $145 million comes from Frank Giustra, the founder of UrAsia Energy and a major Clinton Foundation donor. Guistra says he sold all of his stakes in Uranium One in the fall of 2007, "at least 18 months before Hillary Clinton became Secretary of State" and three years before the Russian deal. We couldn’t independently verify Giustra’s claim from UrAsia’s or Uranium One’s public filings.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...-trump-inaccurately-suggests-clinton-got-pai/

So the accusation is that Clinton got the money in 2008 knowing Russians will want to buy U1 in 2010? Really?
 
Back
Top