Greenpeace co-founder: No scientific proof humans dominant cause of warming climate

lucrum has made the same sort of argument to fraudcurrents many times.

Fraundcurrents and his buddy Stu and stu's sock puppets are not the least bit interested in intellectual honesty. This entire agenda can not even allow intellectual honesty to seep in.
They must use the leftist alinsky style strategy to Demonize and insult anybody and anyone who attempts to bring truth or science into the conversation.

Its a rather disgusting strategy and one we see used by the left on issue after issue.
You see it with the tea party. The tea party is peaceful and the most educated segment of the poltical population per the New York Times poll and another, yet the left and perhaps you... portray the tea party as stupid.
The tea party argues we should follow the constitution, the left calls them extreme.

You saw it during the healthcare debate where the left and news called its critics extreme.
Look what the left and the establishment did and are still attempting to do with Cruz.
Yet withing weeks of the sellout by R leadership... Obama himself was doing the things Cruz stated were needed.

You saw it when Palin stated that if you are soft with Putin he will take advantage of you and attempt to take over Ukraine.
The left called her and idiot.
Over and over the left and its newspapers and commentators try their hardest to marginalize and insult the opposition.

Its why you must leave that side if you yourself have an intellectual integrity.


Maybe this will impress you. Giga tons of carbon are being compare to ppm of CO2. ppm is a relative measure. Gigatons is an absolute measure, and Carbon is not CO2, though they can be related by someone who knows what they are doing.. If you put both the anthropomorphic CO2 and the Total CO2 (Or even Total minus anthropomorphic) on the same scale you wouldn't see the anthro, it would appear as ZERO.

Are you suitably impressed now? Is a smidgen of intellectual honesty too much to expect?
 
fraudcurrents you are also losing your... you are the one splitting off from reality.

her is reality...

Z9aFiycrHek
 
Maybe this will impress you. Giga tons of carbon are being compare to ppm of CO2. ppm is a relative measure. Gigatons is an absolute measure, and Carbon is not CO2, though they can be related by someone who knows what they are doing.. If you put both the anthropomorphic CO2 and the Total CO2 (Or even Total minus anthropomorphic) on the same scale you wouldn't see the anthro, it would appear as ZERO.

Are you suitably impressed now? Is a smidgen of intellectual honesty too much to expect?

Are you kidding? Impressed by what? Bullshit? The chart shows changes of temps CO2 emitted and PPM CO2 , all rising concurrently. Once again you sound like you know something, but really you don't.

It's very simple. Man has raised CO2 levels by 40%. CO2 is greenhouse gas. The GH effect has increased. The temps are going up. The simple obviousness is why 97% of all the world's climatologists agree.

You would have be a total idiot not to understand this relationship. Please refer to the chart I posted.

I repeat, anyone who does not believe in AGW IS AN IDIOT. I don't care if they were head of Greenpeace or a douchebag meteorologist like Bastardi. They are idiots.
 
your statement is a misrepresentation of everything.

co2 and temps are not rising concurrently...
The data shows temperature leads co2.


http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921818112001658

Highlights
► Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging 11–12 months behind changes in global sea surface temperature. ► Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging 9.5–10 months behind changes in global air surface temperature. ► Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging about 9 months behind changes in global lower troposphere temperature. ► Changes in ocean temperatures explain a substantial part of the observed changes in atmospheric CO2 since January 1980. ► Changes in atmospheric CO2 are not tracking changes in human emissions.





Are you kidding? Impressed by what? Bullshit? The chart shows changes of temps CO2 emitted and PPM CO2 , all rising concurrently. Once again you sound like you know something, but really you don't.

It's very simple. Man has raised CO2 levels by 40%. CO2 is greenhouse gas. The GH effect has increased. The temps are going up. The simple obviousness is why 97% of all the world's climatologists agree.

You would have be a total idiot not to understand this relationship. Please refer to the chart I posted.

I repeat, anyone who does not believe in AGW IS AN IDIOT. I don't care if they were head of Greenpeace or a douchebag meteorologist like Bastardi. They are idiots.
 
your statement is a misrepresentation of everything.

co2 and temps are not rising concurrently...
The data shows temperature leads co2.


No you are wrong. CO2 leads temps, because it is a GHG. They are currently rising concurrently. Good to see that I taught you a new word though.

here is more science proving AGW

from NOAA, the world's best single source for climate data. Or maybe you think the French are better at it?

1_Global_Page17-e.png
 
Your logic is fraudulent.
Your "facts" are misrepresentations.
Greenhouse gases also cool.
Why do you keep posting such anti scientific shit. Do you enjoy being a troll?

http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/

For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO, the two most efficient coolants in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95% of that total back into space.
 
this and other papers show you are lying...
co2 trails temps... as far as we know...

co2 always trails temps.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...21818112001658

Highlights
► Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging 11–12 months behind changes in global sea surface temperature. ► Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging 9.5–10 months behind changes in global air surface temperature. ► Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging about 9 months behind changes in global lower troposphere temperature. ► Changes in ocean temperatures explain a substantial part of the observed changes in atmospheric CO2 since January 1980. ► Changes in atmospheric CO2 are not tracking changes in human emissions.
 
this futurecunt guy is something else... I remember back in pre-school, there was this little bastard kid that threw sand in everybody's face when they wanted to play in the sandbox with him.. ssdd
 
Back
Top