Greenpeace co-founder: No scientific proof humans dominant cause of warming climate
- Thread starter JamesL
- Start date
more low level thinking from the troll.
What I have been telling you is that adding more CO2 does logarithmically less warming... but it could most definitely start to do more cooling.
If you learned some science you will see Dr. Moore just told you what I have been telling you... adding CO2 probably impacts water vapor and clouds and that may cause cooling.
Science has no ability right now to accurately model what adding more CO2 actually does because the computers can not model clouds. And they have far greater impact than CO2 itself.
What I have been telling you is that adding more CO2 does logarithmically less warming... but it could most definitely start to do more cooling.
If you learned some science you will see Dr. Moore just told you what I have been telling you... adding CO2 probably impacts water vapor and clouds and that may cause cooling.
Science has no ability right now to accurately model what adding more CO2 actually does because the computers can not model clouds. And they have far greater impact than CO2 itself.
I don't know why I bother, this also will be dismissed and ignored.....
But here is some of the science for you jem..
This is a chart that shows the relative changes in outgoing radiation from the earth between 1970 and 1996 as measured by satellite. Over these 26 years the outgoing radiation at the wavelengths of various GHG's absorbtion bands decreased. Meaning this extra energy was captured in the atmosphere at an increasing rate as these gasses concentrations increased.
If you recall the experiment of Tyndall two hundred years ago, he found that various gasses absorb radiation at certain wavelengths. These gasses are labeled greenhouse gasses.
Figure 2: Change in spectrum from 1970 to 1996 due to trace gases. 'Brightness temperature' indicates equivalent blackbody temperature (Harries 2001).
Now you can't say anymore that there is no science showing......whatever the hell you were saying.
That's what I thought. You are out to lunch. Ready for a padded cell.
I just showed you the science that man's GHG's is causing warming and that you said there was none of and you pull this shit. You're just fucked up. I really don't why I talk to you.
You simply prefer to ignore science and lie to support your political position and that's fucking sad. Science should always precede ideology. You epitomize what is wrong with partisanship and rigid dogmatic political positions. Of course the right has the dogma thing down pat.
The question is does adding a greenhouse gas cause net warming or net cooling. The question is not does co2 absorb some wavelengths. The question is when you add more of it does it wind up blocking more energy or trapping more energy.
Its all very simple fraudcurrents.
Science can't model clouds so there is not way science can claim co2 causes warming since scientist can successfully model co2's impact on clouds.
besides...
CO2 lags change in ocean temps and change in land temps by 12 and 9 months respectively.
peer reviewed paper using standard data sets.
[/QUOTE][/QUOTE]
Its all very simple fraudcurrents.
Science can't model clouds so there is not way science can claim co2 causes warming since scientist can successfully model co2's impact on clouds.
besides...
CO2 lags change in ocean temps and change in land temps by 12 and 9 months respectively.
peer reviewed paper using standard data sets.
Yeah, whatever. The founder of Greenpeace is an idiot according to FC. Thousands of scientists who are skeptical about AGW are idiots according to FC. The heads of Climate Departments at Georgia Tech, MIT and other top U.S. scientific universities are idiots according to FC. Multiple Nobel Prize winners are idiots according to FC. Not a single day goes by without FC proclaiming another top scientist or notable leader an idiot.
Maybe it is time that FC realized he is the idiot.
If they deny AGW, yes they are. And who cares what a tiny stupid minority thinks anyway?
It's simple, obvious and is happening. 40% more CO2....a GHG. There is no way that could NOT lead to warming.
97%
all the science orgs
