in honesty, it's impossible to discuss these topics w/o a bunch of eugenic pseudoscience getting thrown into the mix.
IMO, It boils down to:
Why did nomadic people not care to advance civilization if they're just moving around & out competing beasts looking for another meal?
vs
why did agrarian civilizations with all their bounty manage to settle down to think, & push warfare & technology when needing to out compete other people?
and then there are a whole lot of question of what that does to our brains (out competing animals vs out competing humans)
in fairness, I don't care enough to pursue the answers to those questions, though I care when people are not given a fair shake when people reach conclusions to some of these questions.
IMO, It boils down to:
Why did nomadic people not care to advance civilization if they're just moving around & out competing beasts looking for another meal?
vs
why did agrarian civilizations with all their bounty manage to settle down to think, & push warfare & technology when needing to out compete other people?
and then there are a whole lot of question of what that does to our brains (out competing animals vs out competing humans)
in fairness, I don't care enough to pursue the answers to those questions, though I care when people are not given a fair shake when people reach conclusions to some of these questions.
Last edited: