Cruz looks best to me. Except, I already see the leftist sites speaking of what a natural born citizen is. They seem to be altering their stances already.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m.../ted-cruz-born-canada-eligible-run-president/
all of sudden I seeing pargraphs like this... which is what I had been saying... about obama.
"The Congressional Research Service published a report on the issue after the 2008 election; the agency is tasked with providing authoritative research to all members of Congress. It, too, supported the thinking that "natural born" citizenship means citizenship held "at birth."
But the Supreme Court -- the ultimate arbiter of constitutional questions -- has never ruled on the matter. And that means a note of uncertainty remains.
Sarah H. Duggin, a professor of law at Catholic University, has written about and studied the issue extensively. She told us in 2008 that the question of natural born citizenship is "one of the most deceptively simple, complex issues."
We reached her again this week to ask about Cruzâs eligibility. "It would be reasonable to interpret the Constitutionâs natural born citizenship provision to include children born abroad to U.S. citizens, including Senator Cruz, for a number of reasons," she said.
But is it 100 percent sure?
"Unfortunately, we cannot say for sure without either a definitive Supreme Court ruling, or an amendment to clarify the Constitution.""
When I said things like that last sentence the loser leftists on this board called me a birther.
Quote from AAAintheBeltway:
It's odd how the party which supposedly is there to protect women is so terrified of a strong conservative woman. Of course, they can't take her on on anything substantive because she's right. She was right about death panels three years ago. People see it now. So the media/liberals retreat to tired insults.
I think in 2016 we at least will have one candidate, maybe more, that we can support with enthusiasm. Ted Cruz, maybe Rand Paul, maybe Sarah Palin, who knows?
