global warming physics question.

Quote from oktiri:

except most of that ice is currently over land and when it melts..it'll help inflate oceans.
How stupid are you, Yannis ?
More...
He's irredeemably stupid. Notice how he thinks his iceberg argument negates the fact of ice melting over land. Remember these are people who think their 2000+ year old book written by scientific ignoramuses trumps everything we've learned since.

The most charitable thing I can say about Yannis and his ilk:

"You can't convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep-seated need to believe." -- Carl Sagan
 
Quote from kut2k2:

He's irredeemably stupid. Notice how he thinks his iceberg argument negates the fact of ice melting over land. Remember these are people who think their 2000+ year old book written by scientific ignoramuses trumps everything we've learned since.

The most charitable thing I can say about Yannis and his ilk:

"You can't convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep-seated need to believe." -- Carl Sagan
More...

...and their reasoning is a priori.
 
Quote from kut2k2:

He's irredeemably stupid. Notice how he thinks his iceberg argument negates the fact of ice melting over land. Remember these are people who think their 2000+ year old book written by scientific ignoramuses trumps everything we've learned since.

The most charitable thing I can say about Yannis and his ilk:

"You can't convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep-seated need to believe." -- Carl Sagan
More...

If he is irredeemably stupid than you are as well for not taking notice to the large amount of scientists that strongly disagree with the theory of global warming altogether.

You insult people that have a so called deep seated need to believe but if you were as fair minded as you spoke than you would not believe in global warming with such intensity. Anyone who uses evidence as some type of winning persuasive point when talking about global warming clearly has a deep seated need to believe in it because there is constant mounting evidence against it and large increasing percentages of scientists who disagree with the theory.

Clearly your deep seated outright obvious need to believe in global warming is drastically hurting your argument.
 
Quote from NeoRio1:

If he is irredeemably stupid than you are as well for not taking notice to the large amount of scientists that strongly disagree with the theory of global warming altogether.

You insult people that have a so called deep seated need to believe but if you were as fair minded as you spoke than you would not believe in global warming with such intensity. Anyone who uses evidence as some type of winning persuasive point when talking about global warming clearly has a deep seated need to believe in it because there is constant mounting evidence against it and large increasing percentages of scientists who disagree with the theory.

Clearly your deep seated outright obvious need to believe in global warming is drastically hurting your argument.
More...
Too bad you are too stupid to actually post any links backing up your claims. Your ilk is so stupid, you can't even do basic research. :D

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/12/1206_041206_global_warming.html
 
Quote from kut2k2:

Too bad you are too stupid to actually post any links backing up your claims. Your ilk is so stupid, you can't even do basic research. :D

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/12/1206_041206_global_warming.html
More...

So basically you believe in global warming with 100% certainty because national geographic says so?

31,000 scientists (9,000 Ph.D.s) dispute the theory of global warming.

http://tadcronn.wordpress.com/2008/05/27/global-warming-consensus-31000-scientists-disagree/

See Kut you are the one who has not done the research.

I strongly look forward to your next post if there is one.
 
Rush Limbaugh is not the argument.

The argument is that 31,000 qualified scientists disagree with the theory of global warming.

Good luck disrupting future failing liberal debates because you and your counter parts are crashing and burning on this one.
 
Quote from NeoRio1:

So basically you believe in global warming with 100% certainty because national geographic says so?

31,000 scientists (9,000 Ph.D.s) dispute the theory of global warming.

http://tadcronn.wordpress.com/2008/05/27/global-warming-consensus-31000-scientists-disagree/

See Kut you are the one who has not done the research.

I strongly look forward to your next post if there is one.
More...
This is swatting a slow-motion mosquito.

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Oregon_Institute_of_Science_and_Medicine

See, your deep-seated need to believe leads you to post pseudo-scientific nonsense without doing the rudimentary research that would tell you that what you're posting is crap.

Next.

attachment.php
 

Attachments

You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top