Belgian climate scientist Luc Debontridder said:
CO2 is not the big bogeyman of climate change and global warming. Not CO2, but water vapor is the most important greenhouse gas. It is responsible for at least 75 % of the greenhouse effect. This is a simple scientific fact, but Al Goreâs movie has hyped CO2 so much that nobody seems to take note of it.
New Zealander and climate researcher Dr. Vincent Gray said:
The [IPCC] âSummary for Policymakersâ might get a few readers, but the main purpose of the report is to provide a spurious scientific backup for the absurd claims of the worldwide environmentalist lobby that it has been established scientifically that increases in carbon dioxide are harmful to the climate. It just does not matter that this ainât so.
American climatologist Robert Durrenberger said:
Al Gore brought me back to the battle and prompted me to do renewed research in the field of climatology. And because of all the misinformation that Gore and his army have been spreading about climate change I have decided that ârealâ climatologists should try to help the public understand the nature of the problem.
I like these men simply question the theory.
Back to you now.
Lets say in 5 years I am proved entirely wrong and global warming becomes a fact. Kut would you be willing to use military action in order to stop half the world from undergoing industrial revoltions?
"Oh wait!" says the idealistic bubble head. "Let's tell the countries to cut all of their environmentally harmful productivity and if we ask them nice enough they will!" -It's either idealistic dialogue that will not work or military action. You choose and i expect something logical.
CO2 is not the big bogeyman of climate change and global warming. Not CO2, but water vapor is the most important greenhouse gas. It is responsible for at least 75 % of the greenhouse effect. This is a simple scientific fact, but Al Goreâs movie has hyped CO2 so much that nobody seems to take note of it.
New Zealander and climate researcher Dr. Vincent Gray said:
The [IPCC] âSummary for Policymakersâ might get a few readers, but the main purpose of the report is to provide a spurious scientific backup for the absurd claims of the worldwide environmentalist lobby that it has been established scientifically that increases in carbon dioxide are harmful to the climate. It just does not matter that this ainât so.
American climatologist Robert Durrenberger said:
Al Gore brought me back to the battle and prompted me to do renewed research in the field of climatology. And because of all the misinformation that Gore and his army have been spreading about climate change I have decided that ârealâ climatologists should try to help the public understand the nature of the problem.
I like these men simply question the theory.
Back to you now.
Lets say in 5 years I am proved entirely wrong and global warming becomes a fact. Kut would you be willing to use military action in order to stop half the world from undergoing industrial revoltions?
"Oh wait!" says the idealistic bubble head. "Let's tell the countries to cut all of their environmentally harmful productivity and if we ask them nice enough they will!" -It's either idealistic dialogue that will not work or military action. You choose and i expect something logical.
