Global warming LOL (part 3) -Scientist admit they were wrong

Quote from futurecurrents:

And we should start a drinking game where we all drink whenever you dismiss a perfectly good and true chart because it conflicts with your delusions. We could all get very drunk.
More...
Judging by your posts I thought you were already drunk.
 
Quote from jem:

you are again off the agw nutter reservation on this...
even

al gores sponsored nutter website skeptical science admits co2 lags temps in the record... they then to explain it is possible that after the warming starts co2 amplifies.

of course the co2 could amplify in the beginning and then cause cooling or it could just cause cooling the while time... since science now knows CO2 acts as a thermostat according to nasa.


here is a quote... from skeptical science.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/co2-lags-temperature.htm



"In the case of warming, the lag between temperature and CO2 is explained as follows: as ocean temperatures rise, oceans release CO2 into the atmosphere. In turn, this release amplifies the warming trend, leading to yet more CO2 being released. In other words, increasing CO2 levels become both the cause and effect of further warming. This positive feedback is necessary to trigger the shifts between glacials and interglacials as the effect of orbital changes is too weak to cause such variation. Additional positive feedbacks which play an important role in this process include other greenhouse gases, and changes in ice sheet cover and vegetation patterns."
More...

Yeah so? That was the past. CO2 has led temps higher over at least the last fifty years. We know this with over 95% confidence. Do you enjoy pulling shit out of your ass?
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

...Do you enjoy pulling shit out of your ass?
More...
No more than you enjoyed pulling your gay brother's dick out of your ass.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

And we should start a drinking game where we all drink whenever you dismiss a perfectly good and true chart because it conflicts with your delusions. We could all get very drunk.
More...

The factual climate information posted by people with scientific background in this forum even while drunk is still a huge step up over the fabricated global warming alarmist nonsense you post while sober.

The is a sad indictment on your lack of basic scientific comprehension.
 
Quote from gwb-trading:

The factual climate information posted by people with scientific background in this forum even while drunk is still a huge step up over the fabricated global warming alarmist nonsense you post while sober.

The is a sad indictment on your lack of basic scientific comprehension.
More...

What?

Look. the bottom line is that this chart is correct and accurate. That would reject it offhand speaks volumes about your delusional mindset.

Let me repeat. This chart is correct. If you don't think so then prove it. The data is out there.


1000yr_change.jpg
 
you do not know that at all.
its not backed by any science which works real time. Your models failed as current temps are outside the 95% confidence level of their projections.

co2 is a thermostat... you have no idea if man made co2 is net cooling or net warming because it is only a small sliver of the greenhouse and the greenhouse acts as a thermostat too.


and note... your chart does not show co2 leading temps.

Quote from futurecurrents:

Yeah so? That was the past. CO2 has led temps higher over at least the last fifty years. We know this with over 95% confidence. Do you enjoy pulling shit out of your ass?
More...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top