Global Warming Hoaxsters Say the Ocean is Sinking

[wildchild]

One study. Everything else points to loss.

It was not a study. It was an observation by NASA.

 

[futurecurrents]

It was not a study. It was an observation by NASA.

Yes, one study, the others say otherwise.

 

[jem]

that is not a red herring. It shows your charts "increases" are just noise.

Oh look a red herring.

liar

 

[futurecurrents]

that is not a red herring. It shows your charts "increases" are just noise.

lying again, what else is new.

 

[WeToddDid2]

 

[wildchild]

Yes, one study, the others say otherwise.

It was not a study. It was what NASA observed.

 

[gwb-trading]

Al Gore got a D in science.

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddar...ns-of-antarctic-ice-sheet-greater-than-losses
NASA Study: Mass Gains of Antarctic Ice Sheet Greater than Losses

 

[WeToddDid2]

lying again, what else is new.

Solar variability is not insignificant. Especially in comparison with the energy imbalance that drives global temperature change.

Therefore, because of the combination of the phase of the solar cycle and the strong 2016 El Niño, it is plausible, if not likely, that over the next 10 years of global temperature change will leave an impression of a global warming hiatus.

 

[futurecurrents]

Solar variability is not insignificant. Especially in comparison with the energy imbalance that drives global temperature change.

Therefore, because of the combination of the phase of the solar cycle and the strong 2016 El Niño, it is plausible, if not likely, that over the next 10 years of global temperature change will leave an impression of a global warming hiatus.

No. The current CO2 forcing is a far stronger factor than any solar variation. It's not even close. It overwhelms the solar. The next ice age has been cancelled.

 

[WeToddDid2]

No. The current CO2 forcing is a far stronger factor than any solar variation. It's not even close. It overwhelms the solar. The next ice age has been cancelled.

Oh....I accidentally forgot to mention that I was paraphrasing Hansen and Schmidt.