Global warming hoax fools millions

Quote from Ricter:

Do you, neither left nor right, but stupid, have any idea how amusing you are? You are a griefer who can't get anyone angry.

what the hell is a "griefer"
 
Quote from FeenixRizin:

the stupidity continues ...


I'm not sure what I'd do with myself if you tapped the spigot, for the love of god, please keep it coming

Non sequitur, but my post count will rise with yours.
 
Quote from Ricter:

Non sequitur, but my post count will rise with yours.
"A Rising Tide Lifts All Ships"...

from the melting ice of course.

:)
 
Quote from FeenixRizin:

let me clue you on something ...


I'm a hell of a lot "smarter" and more "experienced" than you.

I only post on this message board for entertainment value.

You idiots are poster boys of the idiot-left.


It reinforces my resolve.


I don't give a fuck about you. I don't mean to persuade you, I don't mean to change your opinions. Your are JOKES to be laughed AT.

Lol, suuure, you betcha.
 
Quote from Wallet:

Cow Farts?

#3 on the list by Planetsave, as the leading cause of global warming

That's an ordinal ranking. Now look at weighting.
 
Quote from Ricter:

That's an ordinal ranking. Now look at weighting.

lets get back to the issue at hand ...


I misspoke this issue is not "amusing' in the least


Well yes, it still is amusing ... Provided that we have a well armed militia
 
The problems you won't read about in U.S. main stream media:

1. The scientest 'peer-reviewed' each others work.
2. They e-mailed each other on how to coordinate their efforts to explain results that did not agree with their 'story line'.
3. They destroyed data that did not agree with their agenda.
4. Now they cannot produce either the data or the methods to reproduce their experiments used to draw their conclusion.

They did not carry out a hoax; but a fraud and a crime. These scientist belong in jail for fraud used to obtain public funds for research.
BBC Exposes 'Fudge Factor' in ClimateGate Global Warming Computer Programming Code
Photo of Jeff Poor.
By Jeff Poor (Bio | Archive)
December 5, 2009 - 11:46 ET

Even the BBC didn't let this scoop get away.

A segment on the Dec. 3 broadcast of BBC's "Newsnight," showed the implications of the story behind the so-called "ClimateGate" scandal are more than just e-mails concealing data, but an incompetence analyzing the data by way of faulty computer code.

John Graham-Cumming, a British programmer known for the open source "POPFile email filtering program" explained how the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit (CRU) had wholesale problems with its computer programming analyzing climate change data, with billion, if not even trillions of dollars, on the line.
Story Continues Below Ad ↓

"This is the source code from the Climatic Research Unit," Susan Watts, science editor at the BBC explained. "John Graham-Cumming is a software engineer. He's not a skeptic on climate change, but he is shocked by what he's seen in the programming. He compared it with the code in the same language written by NASA."

Graham-Cumming criticized the CRU programming for its lack of professionalism and showed faults with it.

"Well, if you look at the NASA stuff, it's really professional," Graham-Cumming said. "You can look at it, you can see the history. If you look at -- what's done here by these alleged CRU files - it's not the thing you'd expect to see in certainly a commercial industry. You would not see this sort of source code because it's not clearly documented. There's not audit history of what's happened to it. So it would be below the standard in any commercial software. "

According to the author of "The Geek Atlas," the programmer even included steps to skip over errors, which shows some of the data analyzed by the East Anglia CRU is completely neglected.

"The programming language actually has a problem," Graham-Cumming said. "And they put in some code to deal with that error. Unfortunately, in doing so they produced another error. And the upshot of this is the error occurs - the underlying error, they will skip over data that they're trying to plot without any warning to the end user. So in some sense there is data that is being lost."

The programmer, unnamed in the BBC segment, even documented his lack of programming skills.

"So in here, he says some things like, ‘Something is very wrong - it's my programming ability, isn't it,'" Graham-Cumming explained. "‘You know, once again, it's further confirmation my abilities are below what is required here.'"

Watts questioned if someone was betting billions or trillions of dollars, should they "be comfortable with" it and Graham-Cumming explained it wasn't.

"I don't think I would be comfortable with that because it is not obvious what it is doing, why it is doing it," Graham-Cumming said. "It needs to be made clear."
 
Back
Top