Global Warming: For Experts Only

[OddTrader]

And these plastic micro-beads and micro-fibers could be potentially a logical answer to why the two red spots located in the middle of the oceans next to Japan and above NZ!!!

Perhaps due to ocean currents at the time/moment!

Q
Below: Interesting when looking at the right-hand side surrounding Japan and further left??? Also the spot just above NZ???

Where do these two spots located in the middle of oceans come from???
UQ

Average carbon dioxide concentrations, Oct. 1 - Nov. 11, 2014, measured by the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 satellite. NASA

Carbon dioxide flux over China, measured by NASA’s Orbiting Carbon oservatory-2 satellite. Image: NASA

The job of monitoring Earth’s carbon cycle and humanity’s carbon dioxide emissions is increasingly supported from above, thanks to the terabytes of data pouring down to Earth from satellites.
https://blogs.csiro.au/ecos/carbon-cycle/

Below: Interesting when looking at the right-hand side surrounding Japan and further left??? Also the spot just above NZ???

Where do these two spots located in the middle of oceans come from???

https://theconversation.com/watchin...studying-earths-carbon-cycle-from-space-72344

Average carbon dioxide concentrations, Oct. 1 - Nov. 11, 2014, measured by the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 satellite. NASA

Recorded starting in 1958 by the late geochemist Charles David Keeling, the Keeling curve measures atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations. Scripps Institution of Oceanography

Geostationary satellites like Geo-Carb and the GOES weather satellites (shown here) are positioned over the equator at an altitude of about 36,000 km (or 22,300 miles) above Earth’s surface and orbit at the same speed as the Earth’s rotation, making them appear to stand still. OCO-2, like the Low Earth satellite shown here, samples a much narrower area. UCAR

 

[OddTrader]

And these plastic micro-beads and micro-fibers could be potentially a logical answer to why the two red spots located in the middle of the oceans next to Japan and above NZ!!!

Perhaps due to ocean currents at the time/moment!

Q
Below: Interesting when looking at the right-hand side surrounding Japan and further left??? Also the spot just above NZ???

Where do these two spots located in the middle of oceans come from???
UQ

Average carbon dioxide concentrations, Oct. 1 - Nov. 11, 2014, measured by the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 satellite. NASA

http://www.bluebird-electric.net/oceanography/pacific_ocean.htm

https://linkstothedamnpaper.wordpress.com/2013/03/19/the-emerging-picture-of-oceanic-plastic/

 

[LacesOut]

Yeah ok troll.


Scientific consensus: Earth's climate is warming

Temperature data from four international science institutions. All show rapid warming in the past few decades and that the last decade has been the warmest on record. Data sources: NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, NOAA National Climatic Data Center, Met Office Hadley Centre/Climatic Research Unit and the Japanese Meteorological Agency.

Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree*: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources.

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

There is no consensus.
But you keep lying about it.
Why?
Because it’s your religion and it has no basis in science.
Congrats liar

 

[OddTrader]

January 14 2016
http://www.smh.com.au/business/cons...woolies-in-microbead-ban-20160113-gm5hwk.html

Plastic microbeads are commonly found in personal care products such as soap, facial cleansers, body scrubs and toothpaste.

The beads are about the size of a grain of sand and cannot be filtered using conventional waste water treatment systems, meaning they end up in waterways and oceans.

Scientists believe that once in the waterways, the plastic particles attract other pollutants such as pesticides and oils and end up in the food chain. Because of their size, scientists believe the toxins are retained in the gut in humans and are not easily excreted.

Thanks to our scientists for their contributions!

Now that we'd better find out the correlations of oceans temperature and annual/accumulative usage (since 1960) of plastic micro-beads!

As well as investigate a diagram for micro-beads ecology cycle, and its association (if any) with the carbon cycle previously known!

History and Evolution of the Microbead
www.ijc.org/en_/blog/2016/02/22/history_evolution_microbead_story2/

Of the microplastics pollution in Great Lakes waters, at least 20 percent are microbeads. Early patents for microbeads in personal care products began in the late 1960s. ... Because of their pervasiveness and tiny size, microbeads are virtually impossible to remove from the environment, especially water.

 

[OddTrader]

A BIG RE-THINK AND RE-DIRECTION IS NECESSARY ???

Too much ‘Taurus Excreta’ and no facts being published on Climate Change

July 15, 2017

Is climate change real? If so, is it a natural event or is it the result of human activity? Or is it an untimely contribution from both? Was it destined by nature anyway and we’re just hurrying it along? But what if it’s not real at all? What if the data is ‘fudged’ and our responses unnecessary?

...

Everyone has an opinion but when asked, cannot explain the thermodynamics of how the minute amount of CO2 at 0.0397% of the atmosphere can drive climate change up or down.

https://theaimn.com/much-taurus-excreta-no-facts-published-climate-change/

CO2 is not a pollutant, it is an important plant food. Our current levels have depleted to 0.0397% and plants, forests and the food chain are the worse for it. How is it possible for this important life sustaining CO2 to be manipulated in people’s minds and its life giving benefits reversed to the extent it is now demonised—it clearly shows the frailty of illogical minds – and dangers to future life.

When looking at industrial CO2 emissions they do not differentiate the dangerous contaminates in the same emissions— many people are confounding carbon dioxide with other air pollutants that come from factory fumes and car exhausts. Real air pollution is a serious problem, but regulating and reducing CO2 will not offer relief from this issue. How convenient to ignore the big problems and blame the only beneficial one—removes the burden of further analysis from feeble thinking. This pathetic mindset allows the dangerous contaminants to be overlooked and excused as they continue their irreversible damage to human and plant genome.

CO2 is naturally occurring and essential for life, all living cells are made of carbon compounds, our protein and food is made from carbohydrate chains, everything is fuelled by carbon, we eat it and exhale it. It is the sole base of our civilisation, CO2 is plant food; vegetable growers increase CO2 in hot-houses (about 300%) increasing production by 40%; food production worldwide will increase if CO2 increases and starvation will decrease. In the Jurassic-Period CO2 was five times higher than now where life flourished.

...

The real problem hidden by ‘climate-change’ hysteria is our oxygen levels. Researchers tell us in ancient times Oxygen was about 30%, today O2 is 20.95% — Why?

Scientists have found that oxygen in the atmosphere has been dropping at higher rates than just the amount that goes into the increase of CO2 from burning fossil fuels, some 2 to 4-times as much, and accelerating since 2002. Simultaneously, oxygen levels in the world’s oceans have also been falling Why? (see Warming Oceans Starved of Oxygen)

The simultaneous decrease in ocean oxygen not only threatens the survival of aerobic marine organisms, but is symptomatic of the slow-down in the ocean’s thermohaline ‘conveyor belt’ circulation system that transports heat from the tropics to the poles, overturns surface layers into the deep and vice versa, redistributing nutrients and gases for the ocean biosphere, and regulating rainfall and temperatures on the landmasses. Analyse of the abrupt climate change during the last glaciation 11 000 to 12 000 years ago suggest that the event may have been triggered by ocean’s thermohaline changes in response to small changes in the hydrological cycle.

This dynamical system is highly nonlinear, and small changes could make it fail altogether, with disastrous runaway effects on the climate (Global Warming & then the Big Freeze, SiS 20 http://www.i-sis.org.uk/LOG3.php). More importantly, it could wipe out the ocean’s phytoplankton that’s ultimately responsible for splitting water to regenerate oxygen for the entire biosphere, on land and in the sea. Current science advises Phytoplankton produces 50% of the worlds oxygen regeneration every day. The Amazon produces one fifth of the world’s oxygen (CO2 released is taken up next day).

Many have been misguided into demonising CO2 as a problem while the REAL problem of decreasing O2 is hidden.

...

We must re-think this unfounded demonising of CO2, and maintain electrical needs with reduced pollution, without spending unnecessary millions and cause havoc with extremely high power costs forcing a very destructive recession upon the people. A BIG RE-THINK AND RE-DIRECTION IS NECESSARY

 

[OddTrader]

"
The crucial role of forests and phytoplankton [4] in oxygenating the earth shows how urgent it is to take oxygen accounting seriously in climate policies. Reductionist accounting for CO2 alone is insufficient, and even grossly misleading and dangerous. "

O2 Dropping Faster than CO2 Rising
Implications for Climate Change Policies

New research shows oxygen depletion in the atmosphere accelerating since 2003, coinciding with the biofuels boom; climate policies that focus exclusively on carbon sequestration could be disastrous for all oxygen-breathing organisms including humans

Dr. Mae-Wan Ho
Article first published 10/08/09
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/O2DroppingFasterThanCO2Rising.php

Within the past several years, however, scientists have found that oxygen (O2) in the atmosphere has been dropping, and at higher rates than just the amount that goes into the increase of CO2 from burning fossil fuels, some 2 to 4-times as much, and accelerating since 2002-2003 [1-3]. Simultaneously, oxygen levels in the world’s oceans have also been falling [4] (see Warming Oceans Starved of Oxygen, SiS 44).

...

Measuring O2 to better understand the earth’s carbon budget

Global CO2 records go back more than 50 years [8], but O2 measurement in combination with CO2 goes back barely two decades [9], and is already giving important information on the size of the carbon sink in the ocean relative to the land. For one thing, O2 and CO2 have very different solubility in seawater; while 99 percent of the O2 remains in the atmosphere, 98 percent of the CO2 is in seawater.

...

These years happen to coincide with record rates of deforestation. In Brazil, 10 000 square miles were lost mainly to pasture land, soybean plantations and illegal logging, a 40 percent rise over the previous year [14]. Massive deforestation has continued in the Amazon and elsewhere, spurred by the biofuels boom [15]; it is estimated that nearly 40 000 ha of the world’s forests are vanishing every day.

The crucial role of forests and phytoplankton [4] in oxygenating the earth shows how urgent it is to take oxygen accounting seriously in climate policies. Reductionist accounting for CO2 alone is insufficient, and even grossly misleading and dangerous.

* Scientist warns we could be breathing in microplastic particles laden ...
www.independent.co.uk/.../microplastic-microbeads-microfibres-pollution-environment-audit-committee-mps-evidence-a7021051.html - Cached - Similar
9 May 2016 ... Giving evidence to the House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee, Professor Frank Kelly, an expert in environmental health from King's College London, said researchers at his centre had just begun a study into whether tiny plastic particles in the air were a significant problem. Plastic microbeads ...

* People may be breathing in microplastics, health expert warns ...
https://www.theguardian.com/.../people-may-be-breathing-in-microplastics-health-expert-warns - Cached - Similar
9 May 2016 ... Environmental health professor says microparticles of plastic, known to damage marine life, could be entering the air. ... of pieces of plastic. Public attention in recent months has focused on one kind of microplastic, called microbeads and used as exfoliants in toiletries such as face washes and toothpastes.

Microbeads – A Science Summary
July 2015
http://www.ec.gc.ca/ese-ees/default.asp?lang=en&n=adda4c5f-1

Proposed conclusion

Based on the available information, it is recommended that microbeads be considered toxic under subsection 64(a) of the Act. This would enable appropriate preventative measures to be taken to reduce the release of microbeads into the environment. As a precautionary next step, the Government of Canada is proposing to add microbeads to the List of Toxic Substances under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA 1999).

 

[OddTrader]

There is another possibility:
Too many visits in the last many decades by UFOs producing too much CO2 due to extra-fast speed flying in the sky/oceans. lol

Existence of advanced UFOs 'beyond reasonable doubt', says ex-Pentagon official who ran secret US government programme

‘I think it's pretty clear this is not us, and it's not anyone else, so one has to ask the question where they're from’

Tom Embury-Dennis
@tomemburyd
Monday 25 December 2017

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...ots-footage-unidentified-flying-a8127881.html


He said: “It was enough where we began to see trends and similarities in incidents. There were very distinct observables. Extreme manoeuvrability, hypersonic velocity without a sonic boom, speeds of 7,000mph to 8,000mph, no flight surfaces on the objects. A lot of this is backed with radar signal data, gun camera footage from aircraft, multiple witnesses.

 

[OddTrader]

Perhaps below a good reason that ETs/UFOs do not want to live on our planet Earth!

Smart strategy indeed! lol

Our Learned Academies Weigh In On Batteries
By Geoff Russell on December 21, 2017

https://newmatilda.com/2017/12/21/our-learned-academies-weigh-in-on-batteries/

A war on waste

Did anybody see the TV series War on Waste? Remember the coffee cups? Who could forget the coffee cups? The size of Australia’s annual coffee cup waste “catastrophe” has been estimated at 60 tonnes of plastic. If there are 1.5 billion people on the planet with a similar level of plastic coffee cup waste, that comes to about 3,750 tonnes. The global annual production of plastic is 380,000,000 tonnes.

It’s a rare skill to be able to find such small problems to distract people from the huge and important problems we face.

Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made

Roland Geyer1,*, Jenna R. Jambeck2 and Kara Lavender Law3

Science Advances 19 Jul 2017

http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782.full

Abstract

Plastics have outgrown most man-made materials and have long been under environmental scrutiny. However, robust global information, particularly about their end-of-life fate, is lacking. By identifying and synthesizing dispersed data on production, use, and end-of-life management of polymer resins, synthetic fibers, and additives, we present the first global analysis of all mass-produced plastics ever manufactured. We estimate that 8300 million metric tons (Mt) as of virgin plastics have been produced to date. As of 2015, approximately 6300 Mt of plastic waste had been generated, around 9% of which had been recycled, 12% was incinerated, and 79% was accumulated in landfills or the natural environment. If current production and waste management trends continue, roughly 12,000 Mt of plastic waste will be in landfills or in the natural environment by 2050.

 

[jem]

Yeah ok troll.


Scientific consensus: Earth's climate is warming

Temperature data from four international science institutions. All show rapid warming in the past few decades and that the last decade has been the warmest on record. Data sources: NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, NOAA National Climatic Data Center, Met Office Hadley Centre/Climatic Research Unit and the Japanese Meteorological Agency.

Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree*: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources.

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

 

[futurecurrents]

And you wonder why we call you intellectually dishonest/a liar.

Another lie. And you call yourself a Christian?

"the difference is almost entirely because NOAA presents their temperature anomalies relative to a 1901-2000 baseline, while HadCRUT4 presents theirs relative to a 1961-1990 baseline. If you shift them to have the same baseline, the discrepancy goes away. The immediate conclusion one might draw is that the figure below is intentionally misleading, but I wouldn’t rule out the possibility that David Rose simply does not understand the concept of a temperature anomaly, despite have written many articles about them."

https://andthentheresphysics.wordpr...ose-david-rose-does-not-understand-baselines/